A Multicenter Phase II Study of Second-Line Axitinib for Patients with Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma Failing First-Line Sorafenib Monotherapy.

Zhong-Zhe Lin, Bang-Bin Chen, Yi-Ping Hung, Po-Hsiang Huang, Ying-Chun Shen, Yu-Yun Shao, Chih-Hung Hsu, Ann-Lii Cheng, Rheun-Chuan Lee, Yee Chao, Chiun Hsu

Journal: The oncologist 2021;25(9):e1280-e1285

PMID: 32271494

Abstract

LESSONS LEARNED

For patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma after failure of first-line sorafenib monotherapy, second-line axitinib provides modest efficacy with tolerable toxicity. The discrepant tumor responses and survival outcomes in trials using axitinib as salvage therapy highlight the importance of optimal patient selection with the aid of clinical biomarkers.

BACKGROUND

Multikinase inhibitors have been effective treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This multicenter phase II study explored the efficacy and safety of second-line axitinib for advanced HCC.

METHODS

Patients with advanced HCC and Child-Pugh A liver function, experiencing progression on first-line sorafenib monotherapy, were eligible. Axitinib 5 mg twice daily was given continuously with allowed dose escalation. Tumor assessment was performed according to RECIST version 1.1. The primary endpoint was rate of disease control.

RESULTS

From April 2011 to March 2016, 45 patients were enrolled. Thirty-seven patients (82%) tested positive for hepatitis B surface antigen. The disease control rate was 62.2%, and the response rate was 6.7%, according to RECIST criteria. Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 2.2 months and 10.1 months, respectively. Treatment-related adverse events were compatible with previous reports of axitinib.

CONCLUSION

Second-line axitinib has moderate activity and acceptable toxicity for patients with advanced HCC after failing the first-line sorafenib monotherapy.

© AlphaMed Press; the data published online to support this summary are the property of the authors.

Address: Department of Medical Oncology, National Taiwan University Cancer Center, Taipei, Taiwan.; Department of Oncology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.; Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan.; Department of Radiology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.; Department of Oncology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.; Department of Oncology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.; Department of Medical Oncology, National Taiwan University Cancer Center, Taipei, Taiwan.; Department of Oncology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.; Graduate Institute of Oncology, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan.; Department of Oncology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.; Graduate Institute of Oncology, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan.; Department of Medical Oncology, National Taiwan University Cancer Center, Taipei, Taiwan.; Department of Oncology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.; Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan.; Graduate Institute of Oncology, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan.; Department of Radiology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.; Department of Oncology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.; School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.