Pharmacological interventions for prevention of depression in high risk conditions: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Saeed Farooq, Surrendra P Singh, Danielle Burke, Farooq Naeem, Muhammad Ayub

Journal: Journal of affective disorders 2021;269():58-69

PMID: 32217344

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Background Depressive disorders account for almost half of all Disability Adjusted Life Years caused by psychiatric disorders but efficacy of pharmacological interventions to prevent depressive disorders is not known. We aimed to assess efficacy of pharmacological treatments in prevention of depression.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Psych Info, EMBASE, and CINHAL from 1980 to January 2020 and bibliographies of relevant systematic reviews. We selected randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that used a pharmacological intervention to prevent the onset of the new depressive episode in adult population. Study selection, data extraction and reporting was done following PRISMA guidelines. Data were pooled using random-effects meta-analysis.

RESULTS

28 trials (2745 participants) were included in meta-analysis. Antidepressants (22 studies), Selenium, Hormone Replacement Therapy Omega-3 fatty acids and Melatonin were used to prevent depression, mostly in physical conditions associated with high risk of depression. All pharmacological interventions [pooled Odds Ratios (OR) 0.37 CI (0.25-0.54)], and antidepressants (OR 0.29, 95% CI: 0.18, 0.46) were significantly more effective than placebo in preventing depression. Antidepressants were significantly better than placebo in trials that had low risk of bias (n = 16; OR 0.43 [0.30, 0.60]), in preventing post stroke depression (OR = 0.16, 95% CI: 0.05, 0.55) and depression associated with Hepatitis C (OR = 0.56, 95% CI: 0.31, 1.02). Limitations include small number of studies focussed only on high risk conditions and short follow up in most studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Prevention of depression may be possible in patients who have high-risk conditions such as stroke but the strategy requires complete risk and benefits analysis before it can be considered for clinical practice.

Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Address: Professor of Psychiatry and Public Mental Health, Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, Keele University, UK; Honorary Consultant Psychiatrist, Midlands Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Stafford, UK. Electronic address: [email protected].; Consultant Psychiatrist, Black Country NHS Partnership Trust, Wolverhampton, UK; Honorary Reader in Mental Health, University of Wolverhampton, Wolverhampton, UK.; Research Associate in Biostatistics, Centre for Prognosis Research, Research Institute for Primary Care & Health Sciences, Keele University, UK.; Professor, University of Toronto and Centre for Addiction & Mental Health, Toronto, Canada.; Professor Department of Psychiatry, Queen's University, 191 Portsmouth Avenue, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.