Comparison of dietary macronutrient patterns of 14 popular named dietary programmes for weight and cardiovascular risk factor reduction in adults: systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised trials.

Thomasin Adams-Webber, Bradley C Johnston, Gordon H Guyatt, Kehu Yang, Jinhui Tian, Ross T Tsuyuki, Adriani Nikolakopoulou, Dena Zeraatkar, Samah Damanhoury, Waleed Ahmed, Long Ge, Mohammad Karamouzian, Henry Y Kwon, Kalimullah Quadri, Ruhi Kiflen, Anton Svendrovski, Christine L Hitchcock, Bruno R da Costa, Geoff D C Ball, Behnam Sadeghirad

Journal: BMJ (Clinical research ed.) 2020;369():m696

PMID: 32238384

Plain Language Summary

plain language summary logo

Dietary recommendations to combat obesity and its associated risk for heart disease are extensive. Many different diets and patterns of eating are being tried by millions of people, however no systematic review comparing their effectiveness has been performed. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the effectiveness of 14 popular diets and diets which restrict certain nutrients on weight loss and heart disease risk. The results identified 121 studies with 21942 patients for inclusion. The Atkins diet, the Zone diet and the Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) diet were the most effective for weight loss and for reducing blood pressure. Low carbohydrate and low-fat diets achieved similar weight loss when compared to a normal diet. Low carbohydrate diets had less effect on heart disease risk factors than low fat and moderate macronutrient diets. There were no improvements in good cholesterol with any of the diets. Interestingly any benefits on weight loss for any of the diets disappeared after 12 months and this was also observed for heart disease risk, except in those on the Mediterranean diet. It was concluded that most diets show improvements to weight loss and heart disease risk factors over 6 months, however these are largely unsustainable after 12 months. Differences between diets are small and healthcare practitioners could use this study to recommend any number of diets to achieve weight loss and the Mediterranean diet in particular to decrease heart disease risk. However, it is important to understand that this may be a short-term fix and at 12 months patients need to be assessed to ensure that weight loss is sustained.

Abstract

[{"label":"OBJECTIVE","text":"To determine the relative effectiveness of dietary macronutrient patterns and popular named diet programmes for weight loss and cardiovascular risk factor improvement among adults who are overweight or obese."},{"label":"DESIGN","text":"Systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised trials."},{"label":"DATA SOURCES","text":"Medline, Embase, CINAHL, AMED, and CENTRAL from database inception until September 2018, reference lists of eligible trials, and related reviews."},{"label":"STUDY SELECTION","text":"Randomised trials that enrolled adults (\u226518 years) who were overweight (body mass index 25-29) or obese (\u226530) to a popular named diet or an alternative diet."},{"label":"OUTCOMES AND MEASURES","text":"Change in body weight, low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, and C reactive protein at the six and 12 month follow-up."},{"label":"REVIEW METHODS","text":"Two reviewers independently extracted data on study participants, interventions, and outcomes and assessed risk of bias, and the certainty of evidence using the GRADE (grading of recommendations, assessment, development, and evaluation) approach. A bayesian framework informed a series of random effects network meta-analyses to estimate the relative effectiveness of the diets."},{"label":"RESULTS","text":"121 eligible trials with 21\u2009942 patients were included and reported on 14 named diets and three control diets. Compared with usual diet, low carbohydrate and low fat diets had a similar effect at six months on weight loss (4.63 4.37 kg, both moderate certainty) and reduction in systolic blood pressure (5.14 mm Hg, moderate certainty 5.05 mm Hg, low certainty) and diastolic blood pressure (3.21 2.85 mm Hg, both low certainty). Moderate macronutrient diets resulted in slightly less weight loss and blood pressure reductions. Low carbohydrate diets had less effect than low fat diets and moderate macronutrient diets on reduction in LDL cholesterol (1.01 mg\/dL, low certainty 7.08 mg\/dL, moderate certainty 5.22 mg\/dL, moderate certainty, respectively) but an increase in HDL cholesterol (2.31 mg\/dL, low certainty), whereas low fat (-1.88 mg\/dL, moderate certainty) and moderate macronutrient (-0.89 mg\/dL, moderate certainty) did not. Among popular named diets, those with the largest effect on weight reduction and blood pressure in comparison with usual diet were Atkins (weight 5.5 kg, systolic blood pressure 5.1 mm Hg, diastolic blood pressure 3.3 mm Hg), DASH (3.6 kg, 4.7 mm Hg, 2.9 mm Hg, respectively), and Zone (4.1 kg, 3.5 mm Hg, 2.3 mm Hg, respectively) at six months (all moderate certainty). No diets significantly improved levels of HDL cholesterol or C reactive protein at six months. Overall, weight loss diminished at 12 months among all macronutrient patterns and popular named diets, while the benefits for cardiovascular risk factors of all interventions, except the Mediterranean diet, essentially disappeared."},{"label":"CONCLUSIONS","text":"Moderate certainty evidence shows that most macronutrient diets, over six months, result in modest weight loss and substantial improvements in cardiovascular risk factors, particularly blood pressure. At 12 months the effects on weight reduction and improvements in cardiovascular risk factors largely disappear."},{"label":"SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION","text":"PROSPERO CRD42015027929."},{"copyright":"\u00a9 Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ."}]
Address: Evidence Based Social Science Research Centre, School of Public Health, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.; Department of Social Medicine and Health Management, School of Public Health, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.; Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.; Michael G DeGroote Institute for Pain Research and Care, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.; Department of Pediatrics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.; Institute of Primary Health Care (BIHAM), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.; Applied Health Research Centre, St Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.; Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.; Department of Community Health and Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.; Zucker School of Medicine at HOFSTRA/Northwell Mather Hospital, Port Jefferson, NY, USA.; School of Medicine, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA.; School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.; HIV/STI Surveillance Research Centre, and WHO Collaborating Centre for HIV Surveillance, Institute for Futures Studies in Health, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran.; Library and Archives Services, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada.; Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.; Department of Agricultural, Food, and Nutritional Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.; Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine (ISPM), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.; Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.; Evidence Based Medicine Centre, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.; Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada [email protected].; Department of Nutrition, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77845, USA.
Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.