Patterns and Outcomes in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients with Portal Vein Invasion: A Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study.

Dong Hyun Sinn, Hye Won Lee, Yong-Han Paik, Do Young Kim, Yoon Jun Kim, Kang Mo Kim, Si Hyun Bae, Ji Hoon Kim, Yeon Seok Seo, Jae Young Jang, Byoung Kuk Jang, Hyung Joon Yim, Hyung Joon Kim, Byung Seok Lee, Bo Hyun Kim, In Hee Kim, Eun-Young Cho, Jung Il Lee, Kyung-Suk Suh

Journal: Digestive diseases and sciences 2021;66(1):315-324

PMID: 32056090

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Sorafenib is a proven first-line treatment recommended for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with portal vein invasion (PVI). However, multiple treatment modalities are used in clinical practice as a first-line option. This study is a prospective, observational, multicenter, cohort study evaluating patterns of treatment modalities and outcomes for HCC patients with PVI.

METHODS

The baseline characteristics, treatment modalities, and outcomes were prospectively collected for 287 newly diagnosed HCC patients with PVI between August 2015 and July 2016 from 16 sites in Korea.

RESULTS

During a median 7.8 months of follow-up (range 0.3-24.6 months), mortality was observed in 123 (42.9%) patients. Decision tree analysis classified patients into five subgroups with different outcomes. The patterns of treatment were very heterogeneous, and there was no dominant treatment modality. The most commonly used treatment modality was transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) (20.2%) followed by TACE plus external beam radiation therapy (17.8%) and sorafenib (12.5%). When stratified according to the extent of PVI, sorafenib treatment showed comparable outcomes when the PVI extent was lobal or main/bilateral, yet showed worse outcomes when the PVI extent was limited to the segmental level compared to those who received treatment other than sorafenib.

CONCLUSIONS

HCC patients with PVI comprise a heterogeneous population and are treated with various treatment modalities with diverse clinical outcomes in clinical practice. Subclassification of HCC patients with PVI is required to minimize heterogeneity and should be considered for the selection of treatment modalities and future clinical trials.

Address: Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, South Korea.; Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.; Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, South Korea. [email protected].; Department of Internal Medicine and Liver Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.; Department of Internal Medicine, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.; Department of Internal Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea.; Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.; Department of Internal Medicine, Soonchunhyang University, Seoul, South Korea.; Department of Internal Medicine, Keimyung University School of Medicine, Daegu, South Korea.; Department of Internal Medicine, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.; Department of Internal Medicine, Chungnam University College of Medicine, Daejeon, South Korea.; Center for Liver Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, South Korea.; Department of Internal Medicine, Chonbuk National University, Chonju, South Korea.; Department of Internal Medicine, Wonkwang University College of Medicine, Iksan, South Korea.; Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.

Link outs

Subscription / membership required

Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.