Postexercise Glucose-Fructose Coingestion Augments Cycling Capacity During Short-Term and Overnight Recovery From Exhaustive Exercise, Compared With Isocaloric Glucose.

Edward A Gray, Thomas A Green, James A Betts, Javier T Gonzalez

Journal: International journal of sport nutrition and exercise metabolism 2021;30(1):54-61

PMID: 31715584

Plain Language Summary

plain language summary logo

Carbohydrate is the dominant energy source during moderate-to-high-intensity exercise. During prolonged exercise, low glycogen availability is inevitable which is associated with the onset of fatigue. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of post-exercise glucose-fructose co-ingestion versus glucose alone on subsequent cycling capacity. This study consists of two randomized, cross-over experiments. Experiment one (double-blind) employed a 4-h recovery (SHORT-EXPERIMENT), whereas, experiment two (single-blind) used a 15-h overnight recovery (OVERNIGHT-EXPERIMENT). Eight trained male cyclists participated in SHORT-EXPERIMENT whereas three female and five male trained cyclists participated in OVERNIGHT-EXPERIMENT. Results demonstrate that post-exercise glucose-fructose co-ingestion, compared to isocaloric glucose alone, augments cycling capacity following short (4-h) and overnight (15-h) recovery periods in trained cyclists. Authors conclude that endurance athletes competing in multi-stage events where recovery time is limited may benefit from consuming fructose alongside glucose in their post-exercise nutritional strategies.

Abstract

During short-term recovery, postexercise glucose-fructose coingestion can accelerate total glycogen repletion and augment recovery of running capacity. It is unknown if this advantage translates to cycling, or to a longer (e.g., overnight) recovery. Using two experiments, the present research investigated if postexercise glucose-fructose coingestion augments exercise capacity following 4-hr (short experiment; n = 8) and 15-hr (overnight experiment; n = 8) recoveries from exhaustive exercise in trained cyclists, compared with isocaloric glucose alone. In each experiment, a glycogen depleting exercise protocol was followed by a 4-hr recovery, with ingestion of 1.5 or 1.2 g·kg-1·hr-1 carbohydrate in the short experiment (double blind) and the overnight experiment (single blind), respectively. Treatments were provided in a randomized order using a crossover design. Four or fifteen hours after the glycogen depletion protocol, participants cycled to exhaustion at 70% Wmax or 65% Wmax in the short experiment and the overnight experiment, respectively. In both experiments there was no difference in substrate oxidation or blood glucose and lactate concentrations between treatments during the exercise capacity test (trial effect, p > .05). Nevertheless, cycling capacity was greater in glucose + fructose versus glucose only in the short experiment (28.0 ± 8.4 vs. 22.8 ± 7.3 min, d = 0.65, p = .039) and the overnight experiment (35.9 ± 10.7 vs. 30.6 ± 9.2 min, d = 0.53, p = .026). This is the first study to demonstrate that postexercise glucose-fructose coingestion enhances cycling capacity following short-term (4 hr) and overnight (15 hr) recovery durations. Therefore, if multistage endurance athletes are ingesting glucose for rapid postexercise recovery then fructose containing carbohydrates may be advisable.

Address: University of Bath.

Patient Centred Factor

Laboratory Testing

Modifiable Lifestyle Factors

Jadad Score

Allocation Concealment

Link outs

Subscription / membership required

Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.