Oral cysteamine as an adjunct treatment in cystic fibrosis pulmonary exacerbations: An exploratory randomized clinical trial.
Jorge Lascano, Deborah A O'Neil, Douglas J Fraser-Pitt, Jennifer Robertson, Emma Lovie, Vincenzina Lucidi, Daniel Peckham, Lorna Murray, Gordon MacGregor, Daniel Layish, Graham Devereux, Benjamin T Kopp, Alastair Innes, Rose Franco, Ryan Dougherty, Simon Doe, Cori L Daines, Stephen J Bourke, Danielle Wrolstad
Journal: PloS one
2021;15(12):e0242945
PMID: 33370348
Abstract
[{"label":"BACKGROUND","text":"Emerging data suggests a possible role for cysteamine as an adjunct treatment for pulmonary exacerbations of cystic fibrosis (CF) that continue to be a major clinical challenge. There are no studies investigating the use of cysteamine in pulmonary exacerbations of CF. This exploratory randomized clinical trial was conducted to answer the question: In future pivotal trials of cysteamine as an adjunct treatment in pulmonary exacerbations of CF, which candidate cysteamine dosing regimens should be tested and which are the most appropriate, clinically meaningful outcome measures to employ as endpoints?"},{"label":"METHODS AND FINDINGS","text":"Multicentre double-blind randomized clinical trial. Adults experiencing a pulmonary exacerbation of CF being treated with standard care that included aminoglycoside therapy were randomized equally to a concomitant 14-day course of placebo, or one of 5 dosing regimens of cysteamine. Outcomes were recorded on days 0, 7, 14 and 21 and included sputum bacterial load and the patient reported outcome measures (PROMs): Chronic Respiratory Infection Symptom Score (CRISS), the Cystic Fibrosis Questionnaire-Revised (CFQ-R); FEV1, blood leukocyte count, and inflammatory markers. Eighty nine participants in fifteen US and EU centres were randomized, 78 completed the 14-day treatment period. Cysteamine had no significant effect on sputum bacterial load, however technical difficulties limited interpretation. The most consistent findings were for cysteamine 450mg twice daily that had effects additional to that observed with placebo, with improved symptoms, CRISS additional 9.85 points (95% CI 0.02, 19.7) p = 0.05, reduced blood leukocyte count by 2.46x109 \/l (95% CI 0.11, 4.80), p = 0.041 and reduced CRP by geometric mean 2.57 nmol\/l (95% CI 0.15, 0.99), p = 0.049."},{"label":"CONCLUSION","text":"In this exploratory study cysteamine appeared to be safe and well-tolerated. Future pivotal trials investigating the utility of cysteamine in pulmonary exacerbations of CF need to include the cysteamine 450mg doses and CRISS and blood leukocyte count as outcome measures."},{"label":"CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION","text":"NCT03000348; www.clinicaltrials.gov."}]
Address:
Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom.; Precision for Medicine, Oncology and Rare Disease, Carlsbad, CA, United States of America.; Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle, United Kingdom.; Banner University of Arizona Medical Center, Tucson, Arizona, United States of America.; San Francisco Critical Care Medical Group California Pacific Medical Center, San Francisco, United States of America.; The Medical College of Wisconsin/Froedtert Hospital, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States of America.; Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.; Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH, United States of America.; University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States of America.; Central Florida Pulmonary Group, Orlando, Florida, United States of America.; Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, United Kingdom.; Raigmore Hospital, Inverness, United Kingdom.; St James's University Hospital, Leeds, United Kingdom.; Ospedale Padiatrico Bambino Gesu Centro Fibrosi Cistica, Rome, Italy.; NovaBiotics Ltd, Aberdeen, United Kingdom.
Link outs
Free resources
Full Text Sources:
Medical:
Miscellaneous:
Research Materials:
MeSH Terms:
Administration, Oral,
Adult,
Cysteamine,
Cystic Fibrosis,
Female,
Humans,
Lung,
Male,
Medication Adherence,
Safety