Stress-induced assays for polyphosphate quantification by uncoupling acetic acid uptake and anaerobic phosphorus release.

Cuijie Feng, Laurens Welles, Xuedong Zhang, Mario Pronk, Danny de Graaff, Mark van Loosdrecht

Journal: Water research 2019;169():115228

PMID: 31698149

Abstract

Phosphorus has been successfully eliminated from wastewater by biological techniques of enhanced biological phosphorus removal (EBPR) process, which relies on a specific microbiota of polyphosphate accumulating organisms (PAOs) that accumulate phosphate as polyphosphates (poly-P). Most methods for quantification of poly-P pools suffer from low accuracy and specificity. More powerful and implementable P-analysis tools are required for poly-P quantification, which will help in improved evaluation of processes in laboratory and full-scale EBPR systems. This study developed two methods to quantify poly-P pools by releasing the poly-P from the cell. During experimental optimization, it was observed that two different methods resulted in the highest phosphate release: acetate addition at a pH of 4.8 and exposure to EDTA solution with a concentration of 1% (w/v). Treatment with EDTA resulted in a higher amount of phosphate release from all sludge samples. This was characterized by P-release of 1.5-2.5 times higher than the control tests. In contrast, treatments with acetate addition at a low pH exhibited that P-release depended upon the types of the sludge samples. The highest P-release amount and rate were found in highly-enriched PAO sludge samples, but with fewer influences on the sludge collected from WWTP, which may be attributed to the lower fraction of PAOs in the sludge. Overall, the proposed approaches to quantify the poly-P concentration can be applied in simple, user-friendly, and cost-effective ways.

Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Address: Department of Biotechnology, Delft University of Technology, Van der Maasweg 9, 2629 HZ, Delft, the Netherlands; Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Polytechnic University of Milano, Piazza Leonardo da Vinci 32, 20133, Milan, Italy. Electronic address: [email protected].; Department of Biotechnology, Delft University of Technology, Van der Maasweg 9, 2629 HZ, Delft, the Netherlands; Environmental Engineering and Water Technology Department, IHE Institute for Water Education, Westvest 7, 2611 AX, Delft, the Netherlands. Electronic address: [email protected].; Department of Water Management, Delft University of Technology, Stevinweg 1, 2628 CN, Delft, the Netherlands.; Department of Biotechnology, Delft University of Technology, Van der Maasweg 9, 2629 HZ, Delft, the Netherlands.; Department of Biotechnology, Delft University of Technology, Van der Maasweg 9, 2629 HZ, Delft, the Netherlands. Electronic address: [email protected].

Link outs

Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.