Josianne Rodrigues-Krause, Mauricio Krause, Ilanna Marques Gomes da Rocha, Daniel Umpierre, Ana Paula Trussardi Fayh
Journal: Nutrients 2019;11(1):15
PMID: 30577559
L-arginine is an amino acid supplement that has shown potential for treating cardiovascular and metabolic diseases, however the current evidence has not produced clear results. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to verify the effects of L-arginine supplementation in individuals with cardiovascular disease, obesity or diabetes. Of the existing research, 13 studies were included for data extraction. The major outcome analysed was blood flow with a focus on specific biochemical markers that regulate vascular dilation. Based on the current literature, no difference was found between oral L-arginine supplementation and improvements in vascular function compared with placebo. The authors conclude this review may provide insight into potential mechanisms for improving endothelial function in individuals experiencing cardiovascular risk, but also note there were significant differences among the participants and intervention strategies in the studies reviewed.
l-Arginine supplementation is a potential therapy for treating cardiovascular and metabolic diseases. However, the use of distinct l-arginine sources, intervened populations, and treatment regimens may have yielded confusion about their efficacy. This research constitutes a systematic review and meta-analysis summarizing the effects of l-arginine supplementation compared to placebo in individuals with cardiovascular disease (CVD), obesity, or diabetes. Eligibility criteria included randomized clinical trials and interventions based on oral supplementation of l-arginine with a minimum duration of three days; comparison groups consisted of individuals with the same disease condition receiving an oral placebo substance. The primary outcome was flow-mediated dilation, and secondary outcomes were nitrite/nitrate (NOx) rate and asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA). Statistical heterogeneity among studies included in the meta-analyses was assessed using the inconsistency index (I2). Fifty-four full-text articles from 3761 retrieved references were assessed for eligibility. After exclusions, 13 studies were included for data extraction. There was no difference in blood flow after post-ischemic hyperemia between the supplementation of l-arginine and placebo groups before and after the intervention period (standardized mean difference (SMD) = 0.30; 95% confidence intervals (CIs) = -0.85 to 1.46; I2 = 96%). Sensitivity analysis showed decreased heterogeneity when the studies that most favor arginine and placebo were removed, and positive results in favor of arginine supplementation were found (SMD = 0.59; 95% CIs = 0.10 to 1.08; I2 = 75%). No difference was found in meta-analytical estimates of NOx and ADMA responses between arginine or placebo treatments. Overall, the results indicated that oral l-arginine supplementation was not associated with improvements on selected variables in these patients (PROSPERO Registration: CRD42017077289).
© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence
We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.