Effects of isometric resistance training on resting blood pressure: individual participant data meta-analysis.

Neil A Smart, Damien Way, Debra Carlson, Philip Millar, Cheri McGowan, Ian Swaine, Anthony Baross, Reuben Howden, Raphael Ritti-Dias, Jim Wiles, Véronique Cornelissen, Ben Gordon, Rod Taylor, Bea Bleile

Journal: Journal of hypertension 2020;37(10):1927-1938

PMID: 30889048

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Previous meta-analyses based on aggregate group-level data report antihypertensive effects of isometric resistance training (IRT). However, individual participant data meta-analyses provide more robust effect size estimates and permit examination of demographic and clinical variables on IRT effectiveness.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic search and individual participant data (IPD) analysis, using both a one-step and two-step approach, of controlled trials investigating at least 3 weeks of IRT on resting systolic, diastolic and mean arterial blood pressure.

RESULTS

Anonymized individual participant data were provided from 12 studies (14 intervention group comparisons) involving 326 participants (52.7% medicated for hypertension); 191 assigned to IRT and 135 controls, 25.2% of participants had diagnosed coronary artery disease. IRT intensity varied (8-30% MVC) and training duration ranged from 3 to 12 weeks. The IPD (one-step) meta-analysis showed a significant treatment effect for the exercise group participants experiencing a reduction in resting SBP of -6.22 mmHg (95% CI -7.75 to -4.68; P < 0.00001); DBP of -2.78 mmHg (95% CI -3.92 to -1.65; P = 0.002); and mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) of -4.12 mmHg (95% CI -5.39 to -2.85; P < 0.00001). The two-step approach yielded similar results for change in SBP -7.35 mmHg (-8.95 to -5.75; P < 0.00001), DBP MD -3.29 mmHg (95% CI -5.12 to -1.46; P = 0.0004) and MAP MD -4.63 mmHg (95% CI -6.18 to -3.09: P < 0.00001). Sub-analysis revealed that neither clinical, medication, nor demographic participant characteristics, or exercise program features, modified the IRT treatment effect.

CONCLUSION

This individual patient analysis confirms a clinically meaningful and statistically significant effect of IRT on resting SBP, DBP and mean arterial blood pressure.

Address: School of Science and Technology, University of New England, Armidale, New South Wales, Australia.; Department of Human Health and Nutritional Sciences, University of Guelph, Guelph.; Department of Kinesiology, University of Windsor, Windsor, Ontario, Canada.; Department of Life and Sports Sciences, University of Greenwich.; Sport and Exercise Science, University of Northampton, UK.; Department of Kinesiology, University of North Carolina, at Charolotte, North Carolina, USA.; Universidade Nove de Julho, Brazil.; School of Human and Life Sciences, Canterbury Christ Church University, UK.; Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.; Department of Exercise and Rehabilitative Sciences, Slippery Rock University, Slippery Rock, Philadelphia, USA.; University of Glasgow, UK.
Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.