Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Chronic Total Occlusion versus Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Non-Complex Coronary Lesions: Is There a Different Impact on Thyroid Function?

OBJECTIVE

This study assessed whether high levels of iodide administered during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for chronic total occlusion (CTO) differentially influenced thyroid function compared to PCI for non-complex coronary lesions.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

A total of 615 patients were enrolled in the study; 205 underwent elective PCI for CTO lesions (Group I) and 410 underwent elective PCI for non-complex lesions including non-CTO, non-bifurcation, non-calcified, and non-tortuous lesions (Group II). Patients were monitored for development of incidental thyroid dysfunction between 1 and 6 months after PCI.

RESULTS

The patients in Group I were administered a median of 255 mL of contrast medium during PCI for CTO; a median of 80 mL was administered to the patients in Group II during non-complex PCI (p =0.001). Ten (5.4%) of the 186 euthyroid patients in Group I and 19 (5%) of the 379 eu-thyroid patients in Group II developed subclinical hyper-thyroidism (p = 0.854). However, 7 (50%) of the 14 subclinical hyperthyroid patients in Group I and only 3 (12%) of the 25 subclinical hyperthyroid patients in Group II developed overt hyperthyroidism (p = 0.019).

CONCLUSION

In euthyroid patients, PCI for coronary CTO lesions did not increase the risk for subclinical hyperthyroidism when compared to PCI for non-complex coronary lesions. However, in patients with subclinical hyperthyroidism at baseline, PCI for coronary CTO lesions significantly increased the development of overt hyperthyroidism when compared to PCI for non-complex coronary lesions.

© 2019 The Author(s) Published by S. Karger AG, Basel.