Genotypic determinants of fluoroquinolone and macrolide resistance in Neisseria gonorrhoeae.

Catherine L Hall, Mark A Harrison, Marcus J Pond, Christine Chow, Emma M Harding-Esch, S Tariq Sadiq

Journal: Sexual health 2020;16(5):479-487

PMID: 31366421

Abstract

UNLABELLED

Background High rates of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in Neisseria gonorrhoeae hinder effective treatment, but molecular AMR diagnostics may help address the challenge. This study aimed to appraise the literature for resistance-associated genotypic markers linked to fluoroquinolones and macrolides, to identify and review their use in diagnostics.

METHODS

Medline and EMBASE databases were searched and data pooled to evaluate associations between genotype and phenotypic resistance. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) cut-offs were ≤ 0.06 mg L-1 for non-resistance to ciprofloxacin and ≤ 0.5 mg L-1 for non-resistance to azithromycin.

RESULTS

Diagnostic accuracy estimates were limited by data availability and reporting. It was found that: 1) S91 and D95 mutations in the GyrA protein independently predicted ciprofloxacin resistance and, used together, gave 98.6% (95% confidence interval (CI) 98.0-99.0%) sensitivity and 91.4% (95%CI 88.6-93.7%) specificity; 2) the number of 23S rRNA gene alleles with C2611T or A2059G mutations was highly correlated with azithromycin resistance, with mutation in any allele giving a sensitivity and specificity of 66.1% (95%CI 62.1-70.0%) and 98.9% (95%CI 97.5-99.5%) respectively. Estimated negative (NPV) and positive predictive values (PPV) for a 23S rRNA diagnostic were 98.6% (95%CI 96.8-99.4%) and 71.5% (95%CI 68.0-74.8%) respectively; 3) mutation at amino acid position G45 in the MtrR protein independently predicted azithromycin resistance; however, when combined with 23S rRNA, did not improve the PPV or NPV.

CONCLUSIONS

Viable candidates for markers of resistance detection for incorporation into diagnostics were demonstrated. Such tests may enhance antibiotic stewardship and treatment options.

Address: Applied Diagnostic Research and Evaluation Unit, St George's University of London, Institute for Infection & Immunity, Cranmer Terrace, Tooting, London SW17 0RE, UK.; Applied Diagnostic Research and Evaluation Unit, St George's University of London, Institute for Infection & Immunity, Cranmer Terrace, Tooting, London SW17 0RE, UK; and National Infection Service, Public Health England, 61 Colindale Avenue, London NW9 5EQ, UK.; Applied Diagnostic Research and Evaluation Unit, St George's University of London, Institute for Infection & Immunity, Cranmer Terrace, Tooting, London SW17 0RE, UK; and National Infection Service, Public Health England, 61 Colindale Avenue, London NW9 5EQ, UK; and St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Blackshaw Road, Tooting, London SW17 0QT, UK; and Corresponding author. Email: [email protected].

Link outs

Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.