Randomized Controlled Phase 2a Study of RPh201 in Previous Nonarteritic Anterior Ischemic Optic Neuropathy.

Eitan Z Rath, Zadik Hazan, Konstantin Adamsky, Arieh Solomon, Zvi I Segal, Leonard A Levin

Journal: Journal of neuro-ophthalmology : the official journal of the North American Neuro-Ophthalmology Society 2020;39(3):291-298

PMID: 31430268

Abstract

BACKGROUND

No proven treatment exists for nonarteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy (NAION), either in the acute or late phase.

OBJECTIVE

To assess safety and changes in visual function and structure after RPh201/placebo treatment in participants with previous NAION.

DESIGN AND SETTING

Phase 2a, single-site, prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-masked trial (registration NCT02045212).

MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES

Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), visual fields, retinal nerve fiber layer, and visual evoked potential at weeks 13, 26, and after a 13-week wash-out ("off-drug") period; and safety.

STUDY POPULATION

Twenty-two participants aged 18 years or older with previous NAION.

INTERVENTION(S)

RPh201 (20 mg) or placebo (cottonseed oil vehicle) administered subcutaneously twice weekly at the study site.

RESULTS

Thirteen men and 9 women were randomized, of which 20 completed all visits. The mean (±SD) age was 61.0 ± 7.6 years. In a post hoc analysis, after 26 weeks of treatment, BCVA improved by ≥15 letters in 4/11 (36.4%) eyes with RPh201, compared to 1/8 (12.5%) eyes with placebo (P = 0.24). Overall, 7/11 (63.6%) of participants on RPh201 showed some improvement in BCVA, compared with 3/8 (37.5%) on placebo (P = 0.26). Improvement in BCVA from a calculated baseline was 14.8 ± 15.8 letters for RPh201 and 6.6 ± 15.3 for placebo (P = 0.27). Of the 154 adverse effects (AEs), 52 were considered related to the study procedures/treatment. Across the study and 1,017 injections, the most frequently reported AE was injection site pain (23 events in 5 participants). There were no clinically significant changes in vital signs or laboratory values.

CONCLUSIONS

This Phase 2a was designed to assess safety, feasibility, and explore potential efficacy signals in treating previous NAION with RPh201. No safety concerns were raised. The results support a larger trial in patients with previous NAION.

Address: Ophthalmology Department (EZR, ZIS), Galilee Medical Center, Nahariya; and Azrieli Faculty of Medicine, Bar-Ilan University, Safed, Israel; Regenera Pharma Ltd (ZH, KA), Israel; Goldschleger Eye Research Institute (AS), Sheba Medical Center, Tel Aviv University, Tel Hashomer, Israel; and Departments of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Neurology and Neurosurgery (LAL), McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.