The effect of an exercise program in pregnancy on vitamin D status among healthy, pregnant Norwegian women: a randomized controlled trial.

Miriam K Gustafsson, Pål R Romundstad, Signe Nilssen Stafne, Anne-Sofie Helvik, Astrid Kamilla Stunes, Siv Mørkved, Kjell Åsmund Salvesen, Per Medbøe Thorsby, Mats Peder Mosti, Unni Syversen

Journal: BMC pregnancy and childbirth 2019;19(1):76

PMID: 30786861

Plain Language Summary

plain language summary logo

Pregnancy represents a unique metabolic state with adaptive physiological changes including the vitamin D endocrine system. The aim of this study was to explore a potential relation between regular exercise in pregnancy and the vitamin D endocrine system. This study is a two-armed, two-centre randomised controlled study. The health effects of a 12-week exercise program during pregnancy (pregnant women n = 855) was compared with standard prenatal care. Results show higher levels of total, free and bioavailable Vitamin D in the exercise group indicating that exercise in pregnancy may affect vitamin D status positively. Authors conclude by highlighting that women with uncomplicated pregnancies should be encouraged to perform regular exercise.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Vitamin D insufficiency is common in pregnant women worldwide. Regular prenatal exercise is considered beneficial for maternal and fetal health. There is a knowledge gap regarding the impact of prenatal exercise on maternal vitamin D levels. The objective of this study was to investigate whether a prenatal exercise program influenced serum levels of total, free and bioavailable 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) and related parameters. This is a post hoc analysis of a randomized controlled trial with gestational diabetes as the primary outcome.

METHODS

Healthy, pregnant women from two Norwegian cities (Trondheim and Stavanger) were randomly assigned to a 12-week moderate-intensity exercise program (Borg perceived rating scale 13-14) or standard prenatal care. The intervention group (n = 429) underwent exercise at least three times weekly; one supervised group training and two home based sessions. The controls (n = 426) received standard prenatal care, and exercising was not denied. Training diaries and group training was used to promote compliance and evaluate adherence. Serum levels of 25(OH)D, parathyroid hormone, calcium, phosphate, magnesium and vitamin D-binding protein were measured before (18-22 weeks' gestation) and after the intervention (32-36 weeks' gestation). Free and bioavailable 25(OH)D concentrations were calculated. Regression analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was applied to assess the effect of the training regime on each substance with pre-intervention levels as covariates. In a second model, we also adjusted for study site and sampling month. Intention-to-treat principle was used.

RESULTS

A total of 724 women completed the study. No between-group difference in serum 25(OH)D and related parameters was identified by ANCOVA using baseline serum levels as covariates. The second model revealed a between-group difference in levels of 25(OH)D (1.9, 95% CI 0.0 to 3.8 nmol/L; p = 0.048), free 25(OH)D (0.55, 95% CI 0.10 to 0.99 pmol/L; p = 0.017) and bioavailable 25(OH)D (0.15 95% CI 0.01 to 0.29 nmol/L; p = 0.036). No serious adverse events related to regular exercise were seen.

CONCLUSION

This study, a post hoc analysis, indicates that exercise may affect vitamin D status positively, and emphasizes that women with uncomplicated pregnancies should be encouraged to perform regular exercise.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00476567 , registered May 22, 2007.

Address: Department of Public Health and Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), PO Box 8905, 7491, Trondheim, Norway. [email protected].; Division of Mental Health Care, Trondheim University Hospital (St. Olavs hospital), Trondheim, Norway. [email protected].; Department of Public Health and Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), PO Box 8905, 7491, Trondheim, Norway.; Department of Public Health and Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), PO Box 8905, 7491, Trondheim, Norway.; Clinic of Clinical Services, Trondheim University Hospital (St. Olavs hospital), Trondheim, Norway.; Department of Public Health and Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), PO Box 8905, 7491, Trondheim, Norway.; Trondheim University Hospital (St. Olavs hospital), Trondheim, Norway.; Trondheim University Hospital (St. Olavs hospital), Trondheim, Norway.; Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway.; Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway.; Department of Obstretics and Gynaecology, Trondheim University Hospital (St. Olavs hospital), Trondheim, Norway.; Hormone Laboratory, Department of Medical Biochemistry, Oslo University Hospital, Aker sykehus, Oslo, Norway.; Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway.; Department of Endocrinology, Trondheim University Hospital (St. Olavs hospital), Trondheim, Norway.

Patient Centred Factor

Clinical Imbalances

Laboratory Testing

Modifiable Lifestyle Factors

Jadad Score

Allocation Concealment

Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.