R Frankenberger, W O Strobel, J Baresel, T Trapper, N Krämer, A Petschelt
Journal: Clinical oral investigations 2002;5(4):260-5
PMID: 11800440
The effect of pre-treatment of composite inlays on bonding performance between a resin composite inlay and a luting composite has not been fully studied. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the influence of three different pre-treatment modes on fatigue bond strength and marginal adaptation. One hundred twenty resin composite discs (Tetric Ceram) were made as simulated inlays and randomly assigned to four groups (n=30): Without treatment (WT), hydrofluoric acid etching for 15 s + silanating (HF), roughening with a silicon carbide bur (SC), and silica coating + silanating (CO). Luting composite cylinders (Variolink II low) were bonded to the discs using Heliobond, and after 24 h in water at 37 degrees C, quasistatic shear bond strengths (n=l) and fatigue bond strengths (n=20; 5,000 cycles) were measured. Thirty-two third molars received occlusomesial Class II cavities (n=8), and direct resin composite inlays were luted with identical methods and materials. Before and after thermomechanical loading (100,000x50 N, 2,500 x +5 degrees C/+55 degrees C), replicas were made and examined (SEM, x200). CO and SC exhibited significantly higher bond strengths and adhesive fatigue limits than HF and WT (P<0.05). After thermomechanical loading, CO (98% continuous margin) and SC (95% continuous margin) demonstrated that they provide significantly more fatigue resistance than HF (88%).
Miscellaneous:
Research Materials:
Full Text Sources:
© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence
We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.