Efficacy of F-100, diluted F-100, and infant formula as rehabilitation diet for infants aged < 6 months with severe acute malnutrition: a randomized clinical trial.

M Munirul Islam, Sayeeda Huq, Md Iqbal Hossain, A M Shamsir Ahmed, Ann Ashworth, Md Abid Hossain Mollah, Tahmeed Ahmed

Journal: European journal of nutrition 2021;59(5):2183-2193

PMID: 31367914

Abstract

PURPOSE

To assess the efficacy and safety of F-100, diluted F-100 (F100D), and infant formula (IF) for dietary management in the rehabilitation phase of severe acute malnutrition (SAM) of infants aged under 6 months (u6m).

METHODS

Double-blind randomized clinical trial was conducted to assess the efficacy and safety of F-100, F-100D, and IF at the Nutrition Rehabilitation Unit, icddr,b. Infants (n = 153) u6m with SAM were enrolled and randomly assigned to any of the three diets after stabilization. Two ml blood was collected on study days 1, 3, and 7 for measuring serum electrolytes, creatinine and osmolality, urine samples for specific gravity and osmolality creatinine ratio. Renal Solute Load (RSL) and Potential Renal Solute Load (PRSL) were calculated. Infants were discharged when gained 15% of the admission bodyweight or had edema-free weight-for-length Z-score ≥ - 2.

RESULTS

Infants fed F-100 and F-100D had higher weight gain than infants who received IF. Mean difference between F-100 and IF was 4.6 g/kg/d (95% CI 1.5-7.6, P = 0.004) and between F-100D and IF was 3.1 g/kg/d (95% CI 0.6-5.5, P = 0.015). Total energy intake from study diet and breast milk was significantly higher in infants fed F-100 compared with other two diets (P = 0.001 in each case). RSL was highest in infants fed F-100 but serum sodium showed no sign of elevation. Urinary specific gravity and serum sodium values were within normal range.

CONCLUSIONS

F-100 can be safely used in the rehabilitation phase for infants  u6m with SAM and there is no need to prepare alternative formulations.

Address: Nutrition and Clinical Services Division, International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh (icddr,b), Dhaka, 1212, Bangladesh. [email protected].; Nutrition and Clinical Services Division, International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh (icddr,b), Dhaka, 1212, Bangladesh.; Primary Health Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, 7000, Australia.; Department of Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.; Department of Paediatrics, Bangladesh Institute of Research and Rehabilitation in Diabetes, Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders (BIRDEM), Dhaka, 1000, Bangladesh.

Link outs

Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.