Does Beef Protein Supplementation Improve Body Composition and Exercise Performance? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Pedro L Valenzuela, Fernando Mata, Javier S Morales, Adrián Castillo-García, Alejandro Lucia

Journal: Nutrients 2020;11(6):1429

PMID: 31242624

Plain Language Summary

plain language summary logo

While protein consumption can help the muscle-building process, it can be affected by many factors including the source of protein. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the impact of protein supplementation, namely whey and beef, combined with exercise training on body composition or exercise performance. According to the seven studies included in this review, there was no significant difference between beef protein or whey protein for total protein intake, lean body mass or fat mass. Based on these results, the authors conclude beef protein provides similar effects to whey protein on protein intake and body composition. Beef protein may further help to improve lean body mass and lower-limb muscle strength, although these results should be considered at more detail in future studies.

Abstract

Protein supplementation might improve body composition and exercise performance. Supplements containing whey protein (WP) have received the most attention, but other protein sources such as beef protein (BP) are gaining popularity. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials that compared the effects of exercise training combined with BP, WP or no protein supplementation (NP), on body composition or exercise performance. Secondary endpoints included intervention effects on total protein intake and hematological parameters. Seven studies ( = 270 participants) were included. No differences were found between BP and WP for total protein intake (standardized mean difference (SMD) = 0.04, = 0.892), lean body mass (LBM) (SMD = -0.01, = 0.970) or fat mass (SMD = 0.07, = 0.760). BP significantly increased total daily protein intake (SMD = 0.68, < 0.001), LBM (SMD = 0.34, = 0.049) and lower-limb muscle strength (SMD = 0.40, = 0.014) compared to NP, but no significant differences were found between both conditions for fat mass (SMD = 0.15, = 0.256), upper-limb muscle strength (SMD = 0.16, = 0.536) or total iron intake (SMD = 0.29, = 0.089). In summary, BP provides similar effects to WP on protein intake and body composition and, compared to NP, might be an effective intervention to increase total daily protein intake, LBM and lower-limb muscle strength.

Address: Department of Systems Biology, University of Alcalá, 28805 Madrid, Spain. [email protected].; NutriScience, Nutrition & Health Sciences, 14002 Córdoba, Spain. [email protected].; Faculty of Sport Sciences, Universidad Europea de Madrid and Research Institute 'i+12' (Hospital 12 de Octubre), 28670 Madrid, Spain. [email protected].; Fissac-Physiology, health and physical activity, 28015 Madrid, Spain. [email protected].; Faculty of Sport Sciences, Universidad Europea de Madrid and Research Institute 'i+12' (Hospital 12 de Octubre), 28670 Madrid, Spain. [email protected].
Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.