A Randomized Trial Evaluating Bioimpedance Spectroscopy Versus Tape Measurement for the Prevention of Lymphedema Following Treatment for Breast Cancer: Interim Analysis.

Sheila H Ridner, Mary S Dietrich, Michael S Cowher, Bret Taback, Sarah McLaughlin, Nicolas Ajkay, John Boyages, Louise Koelmeyer, Sarah M DeSnyder, Jamie Wagner, Vandana Abramson, Andrew Moore, Chirag Shah

Journal: Annals of surgical oncology 2020;26(10):3250-3259

PMID: 31054038

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) represents a major source of morbidity among breast cancer survivors. Increasing data support early detection of subclinical BCRL followed by early intervention. A randomized controlled trial is being conducted comparing lymphedema progression rates using volume measurements calculated from the circumference using a tape measure (TM) or bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS).

METHODS

Patients were enrolled and randomized to either TM or BIS surveillance. Patients requiring early intervention were prescribed a compression sleeve and gauntlet for 4 weeks and then re-evaluated. The primary endpoint of the trial was the rate of progression to clinical lymphedema requiring complex decongestive physiotherapy (CDP), with progression defined as a TM volume change in the at-risk arm ≥ 10% above the presurgical baseline. This prespecified interim analysis was performed when at least 500 trial participants had ≥ 12 months of follow-up.

RESULTS

A total of 508 patients were included in this analysis, with 109 (21.9%) patients triggering prethreshold interventions. Compared with TM, BIS had a lower rate of trigger (15.8% vs. 28.5%, p < 0.001) and longer times to trigger (9.5 vs. 2.8 months, p = 0.002). Twelve triggering patients progressed to CDP (10 in the TM group [14.7%] and 2 in the BIS group [4.9%]), representing a 67% relative reduction and a 9.8% absolute reduction (p = 0.130).

CONCLUSIONS

Interim results demonstrated that post-treatment surveillance with BIS reduced the absolute rates of progression of BCRL requiring CDP by approximately 10%, a clinically meaningful improvement. These results support the concept of post-treatment surveillance with BIS to detect subclinical BCRL and initiate early intervention.

Address: Vanderbilt University School of Nursing, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA. [email protected].; Vanderbilt University School of Nursing, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.; Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.; Department of Surgery, Alleghany General Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.; Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.; Section of Surgical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA.; Department of Surgery, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA.; Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.; Division of Surgery, Department of Breast Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.; University of Kansas Medical Center, Westwood, KS, USA.; Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.; Southeast Health Southeast Cancer Center, Cape Girardeau, MO, USA.; Department of Radiation Oncology, Cleveland Clinic, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.