2-[Fluorine-18]-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose positron emission tomography in the diagnosis of recurrent ovarian cancer.

M Zimny, W Siggelkow, W Schröder, B Nowak, S Biemann, W Rath, U Buell

Journal: Gynecologic oncology 2001;83(2):310-5

PMID: 11606090

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to investigate the role of 2-[fluorine-18]-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG PET) in the diagnosis of recurrent ovarian cancer.

METHODS

One hundred six FDG PET scans performed in 54 patients in the follow-up after cytoreductive surgery and chemotherapy of ovarian cancer were reevaluated. Fifty-eight scans were performed in patients with suspected recurrence and 48 scans in patients who were clinically disease free. Thirty-seven PET scans were validated by histology and 66 studies by a median follow-up of 22 months in disease-free patients or 12 months in patients with recurrent disease. Three scans were validated by concordant positive findings of tumor marker CA125, computed tomography, and FDG PET.

RESULTS

FDG PET correctly identified recurrent disease in 73/88 cases. PET ruled out recurrent disease in 15/18 cases. The sensitivity and specificity for PET were 83 and 83%, respectively. In patients with suspected disease, sensitivity was 94% compared to 65% in patients judged clinically disease free. The sensitivity of PET was 96% if suspicion of recurrence was based on a rise of CA125 alone. PET preceded the conventional diagnosis by a median of 6 months in patients judged clinically free of disease. The median relapse-free interval after a negative PET scan was 20 months.

CONCLUSION

FDG PET provides the chance to detect recurrent ovarian cancer at an earlier stage during follow-up. Patients with a negative PET scan have a longer relapse-free interval than patients with a positive PET scan.

Copyright 2001 Academic Press.

Address: Department of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Aachen University of Technology, Pauwelsstrasse 30, Aachen, 52074, Germany. [email protected]
Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.