Symptomatic Tarlov cysts are often overlooked: ten reasons why-a narrative review.

Mieke Hulens, Ricky Rasschaert, Frans Bruyninckx, Wim Dankaerts, Ingeborg Stalmans, Peter De Mulder, Greet Vansant

Journal: European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society 2020;28(10):2237-2248

PMID: 31079249

Abstract

PURPOSE

Tarlov cysts (TCs) are dilations of nerve roots arising from pathologically increased hydrostatic pressure (HP) in the spinal canal. There is much controversy regarding whether these cysts are a rare source of pain or often produce symptoms. The aim of this review was to identify the reasons that symptomatic TCs (STCs) are easily overlooked.

METHODS

The literature was searched for data regarding pathogenesis and symptomatology.

RESULTS

TCs may be overlooked for the following reasons: (1) STCs are considered clinically irrelevant findings; (2) it is assumed that it is clinically difficult to ascertain that TCs are the cause of pain; (3) MRI or electromyography studies only focus on the L1 to S1 nerves; (4) TCs are usually not reported by radiologists; (5) degenerative alterations of the lumbosacral spine are almost always identified as the cause of a patient's pain; (6) it is not generally known that small TCs can be symptomatic; (7) examinations and treatments usually focus on the cysts as an underlying mechanism; however, essentially, increased HP is the main underlying mechanism for producing symptoms. Consequently, STCs may relapse after surgery; (8) bladder, bowel and sphincter dysfunction are not inquired about during history taking. (9) Unexplained pain is often attributed to depression, whereas depression is more likely the consequence of debilitating neuropathic pain. (10) The recognition of STCs is subject to gender bias, confirmation bias and cognitive dissonance and unconscious bias in publishing.

CONCLUSION

There are several reasons STCs are underdiagnosed, mostly due to persistent misconceptions and biases. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

Address: Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation Research Unit, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Kinesiology and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Leuven, Tervuursevest 101, 3001, Heverlee, Belgium. [email protected].; , Sint-Joris-Weert, Belgium. [email protected].; Department of Neurosurgery, AZ Rivierenland, Kasteelstraat 23, 2880, Bornem, Belgium.; Clinical Electromyography Laboratory, University Hospitals UZ Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.; Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation Research Unit, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Kinesiology and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Leuven, Tervuursevest 101, 3001, Heverlee, Belgium.; Ophthalmology Research Group, Department of Neurosciences, University of Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.; Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospitals UZ Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.; Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Therapy, Imelda Hospital, 2820 Bonheiden, Belgium.; Department of Social and Primary Health Care, Public Health Nutrition, University of Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.

Link outs

Subscription / membership required

Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.