International Expert Consensus on a Cell Therapy Communication Tool: DOSES.

Iain R Murray, Jorge Chahla, Marc R Safran, Aaron J Krych, Daniel B F Saris, Arnold I Caplan, Robert F LaPrade

Journal: The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume 2019;101(10):904-911

PMID: 31094982

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The lack of a standardized system for describing cell therapies acts as a barrier to advancement in clinical and basic research and practice. The aim of this study was to establish an international expert consensus on strategies to improve standardization and transparency when describing cell therapies. The secondary aim was to develop a consensus among experts on the contents of a standardized tool for describing cell therapies.

METHODS

The need for expert consensus on strategies to improve cell therapy communication was confirmed at the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons/National Institutes of Health Optimizing Clinical Use of Biologics Symposium in 2018. A working group of 6 experts convened an international consensus process involving clinicians and basic scientists using validated Delphi methodology. This iterative process was used to define statements on communication of cell therapies and develop a standardized tool for describing cell therapies.

RESULTS

Thirty-four experts completed 3 rounds survey with use of the Delphi process. After 3 rounds, 27 statements relating to existing nomenclature, solutions to improve communication, ideal characteristics of a framework, mandatory elements of a new framework, and future work to facilitate application reached consensus with >80% agreement and <5% disagreement. Consensus was reached on the contents of a tool for improving standardization and transparency when describing cell therapies. This tool, dubbed "DOSES," is based on the reporting of 5 core items: donor (i.e., autologous, allogeneic, xenogeneic), origin of tissue, separation from other cell types/preparation method, exhibited cell characteristics associated with behavior, and the site of delivery.

CONCLUSIONS

This study has established expert consensus on the communication of cell therapies. The DOSES tool has been developed to improve standardization and transparency in describing cell therapies.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The DOSES tool for describing cell therapies can be utilized by researchers, clinicians, regulators, and industry professionals to improve standardization and transparency when describing cell therapies. The use of this tool may allow clinicians and patients to better understand the characteristics of current and future cell preparations.

Address: Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.; Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois.; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Redwood City, California.; Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.; Skeletal Research Center, Biology Department, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio.; The Steadman Clinic, Vail, Colorado.
Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.