A review of guidelines to distinguish between gastric and pulmonary placement of nasogastric tubes.

Norma A Metheny, Mary M Krieger, Frances Healey, Kathleen L Meert

Journal: Heart & lung : the journal of critical care 2020;48(3):226-235

PMID: 30665700

Abstract

The purpose of this review was to (1) identify areas of agreement and disagreement in guidelines/recommendations to distinguish between gastric and pulmonary placement of nasogastric tube and (2) summarize factors that affect choices made by clinicians regarding which method(s) to use in specific situations. Systematic searches were conducted in the PubMed, Scopus, and CINAHL Plus databases using a combination of keywords and data-specific subject headings. Searches were limited to guidelines/recommendations from national level specialty groups and governmental sources published in the English language between January 1, 2015 and September 20, 2018. Fourteen guidelines that described methods to distinguish between gastric and pulmonary placement of nasogastric tubes were identified from a variety of geographic locations. Tube placement testing methods included in the review were: radiography, respiratory distress, aspirate appearance, aspirate pH, auscultation, carbon dioxide detection and enteral access devices. All fourteen guidelines agreed that radiography is the most accurate testing method. Of the nonradiographic methods, pH testing was most favored; least favored was auscultation.

Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Address: St. Louis University School of Nursing, 3525 Caroline Mall, St. Louis, MO 63104, USA. Electronic address: [email protected].; St. Louis University School of Nursing, 3525 Caroline Mall, St. Louis, MO 63104, USA. Electronic address: [email protected].; National Health Services, Wellington House, 133-155 Waterloo Road, London SE1 8UG, United Kingdom. Electronic address: [email protected].; Childrens Hospital, Wayne State University, 3901 Beaubien Street, Detroit, MI, USA. Electronic address: [email protected].
Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.