A meta-analysis of plant responses to light intensity for 70 traits ranging from molecules to whole plant performance.

Hendrik Poorter, Ülo Niinemets, Nikolaos Ntagkas, Alrun Siebenkäs, Maarit Mäenpää, Shizue Matsubara, ThijsL Pons

Journal: The New phytologist 2020;223(3):1073-1105

PMID: 30802971

Abstract

By means of meta-analyses we determined how 70 traits related to plant anatomy, morphology, chemistry, physiology, growth and reproduction are affected by daily light integral (DLI; mol photons m  d ). A large database including 500 experiments with 760 plant species enabled us to determine generalized dose-response curves. Many traits increase with DLI in a saturating fashion. Some showed a more than 10-fold increase over the DLI range of 1-50 mol m  d , such as the number of seeds produced per plant and the actual rate of photosynthesis. Strong decreases with DLI (up to three-fold) were observed for leaf area ratio and leaf payback time. Plasticity differences among species groups were generally small compared with the overall responses to DLI. However, for a number of traits, including photosynthetic capacity and realized growth, we found woody and shade-tolerant species to have lower plasticity. We further conclude that the direction and degree of trait changes adheres with responses to plant density and to vertical light gradients within plant canopies. This synthesis provides a strong quantitative basis for understanding plant acclimation to light, from molecular to whole plant responses, but also identifies the variables that currently form weak spots in our knowledge, such as respiration and reproductive characteristics.

© 2019 The Authors. New Phytologist © 2019 New Phytologist Trust.

Address: Plant Sciences (IBG-2), Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, D-52425, Jülich, Germany.; Department of Biological Sciences, Macquarie University, North Ryde, NSW, 2109, Australia.; Institute of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Estonian University of Life Sciences, Kreutzwaldi 1, Tartu, 51006, Estonia.; Estonian Academy of Sciences, Kohtu 6, Tallinn, 10130, Estonia.; Department for Nature Conservation and Landscape Planning, Anhalt University of Applied Sciences, Strenzfelder Allee 28, 06406, Bernburg, Germany.; Department of Environmental and Biological Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, FI-80101, Joensuu, Finland.; Plant Ecophysiology, Institute of Environmental Biology, Utrecht University, 3512 PN, Utrecht, the Netherlands.

Link outs

Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.