Technical recommendations to perform the alkaline standard and enzyme-modified comet assay in human biomonitoring studies.

Amaya Azqueta, Damian Muruzabal, Elisa Boutet-Robinet, Mirta Milic, Maria Dusinska, Gunnar Brunborg, Peter Møller, Andrew R Collins

Journal: Mutation research. Genetic toxicology and environmental mutagenesis 2020;843():24-32

PMID: 31421734

Abstract

The comet assay (single cell gel electrophoresis) is widely used as a biomonitoring tool to assess DNA damage - strand breaks, as well as oxidised bases; it can also be adapted to measure DNA repair. It is based on the ability of breaks in the DNA to relax supercoiling, allowing DNA loops to extend from the nuclear core (nucleoid) under an electric field to form a comet-like tail. Most commonly, it is applied to white blood cells. The range of detection is between a few hundred breaks per cell and a few thousand, encompassing levels of damage that can be repaired and tolerated by human cells. Its applications include monitoring various diseases, studying the influence of nutrition on DNA stability, and investigating effects of environmental and occupational mutagens. Here we address the issue of inter-laboratory variation in comet assay results. This variation is largely due to differences in methods. Imposing a standard protocol is not practical, but users should be aware of the crucial parameters that affect performance of the assay. These include the concentration of agarose in which the cells are embedded; the duration of cell lysis, and of enzyme incubation when oxidised bases are being measured; the duration of alkaline unwinding; the duration of electrophoresis and the voltage gradient applied; and the method used to score the comets. Including reference standards in each experiment allows experimental variability to be monitored - and if variation is not extreme, results can be normalised using reference standard values. Reference standards are also essential for inter-laboratory comparison. Finally, we offer recommendations which, we believe, will limit variability and increase the usefulness of this assay in molecular epidemiology.

Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Address: Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Navarra, C/Irunlarrea 1, 31009 Pamplona, Spain; IdiSNA, Navarra Institute for Health Research, Spain. Electronic address: [email protected].; Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Navarra, C/Irunlarrea 1, 31009 Pamplona, Spain. Electronic address: [email protected].; Toxalim (Research Centre in Food Toxicology), Université de Toulouse, INRA, ENVT, INP-Purpan, UPS, Toulouse, France. Electronic address: [email protected].; Mutagenesis Unit, Institute for Medical Research and Occupational Health, Ksaverska cesta 2, 10 001 Zagreb, Croatia. Electronic address: [email protected].; Health Effects Laboratory, Department of Environmental Chemistry, Norwegian Institute for Air Research, Kjeller, Norway. Electronic address: [email protected].; Department of Molecular Biology, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, 4404 Nydalen, Oslo, Norway; Centre for Environmental Radioactivity (CoE CERAD), Ås 1432, Norway. Electronic address: [email protected].; Department of Public Health, Section of Environmental Health, University of Copenhagen, Øster Farimagsgade 5A, DK-1014 Copenhagen K, Denmark. Electronic address: [email protected].; Department of Nutrition, Institute for Basic Medical Sciences, University of Oslo, Sognsvannsveien 9, 0372 Oslo, Norway. Electronic address: [email protected].

Link outs

Free resources

Subscription / membership required

Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.