Selective auxin agonists induce specific AUX/IAA protein degradation to modulate plant development.

Per-Anders Enquist, Stéphanie Robert, Laurens Pauwels, Mark Estelle, Stefan Kepinski, Fredrik Almqvist, Judy Callis, Karin Ljung, Yi Zhang, Sigurd Ramans Harborough, Małgorzata Łangowska, Adeline Rigal, Thomas Vain, Alexandre Ismail, Ondřej Novák, Barbora Pařízková, Mattias Thelander, Siamsa M Doyle, Qian Ma, Martin Kieffer, Deepak Kumar Barange, Noel Ferro, Sara Raggi

Journal: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2019;116(13):6463-6472

PMID: 30850516

Abstract

Auxin phytohormones control most aspects of plant development through a complex and interconnected signaling network. In the presence of auxin, AUXIN/INDOLE-3-ACETIC ACID (AUX/IAA) transcriptional repressors are targeted for degradation by the SKP1-CULLIN1-F-BOX (SCF) ubiquitin-protein ligases containing TRANSPORT INHIBITOR RESISTANT 1/AUXIN SIGNALING F-BOX (TIR1/AFB). CULLIN1-neddylation is required for SCF functionality, as exemplified by mutants deficient in the NEDD8-activating enzyme subunit AUXIN-RESISTANT 1 (AXR1). Here, we report a chemical biology screen that identifies small molecules requiring AXR1 to modulate plant development. We selected four molecules of interest, RubNeddin 1 to 4 (RN1 to -4), among which RN3 and RN4 trigger selective auxin responses at transcriptional, biochemical, and morphological levels. This selective activity is explained by their ability to consistently promote the interaction between TIR1 and a specific subset of AUX/IAA proteins, stimulating the degradation of particular AUX/IAA combinations. Finally, we performed a genetic screen using RN4, the RN with the greatest potential for dissecting auxin perception, which revealed that the chromatin remodeling ATPase BRAHMA is implicated in auxin-mediated apical hook development. These results demonstrate the power of selective auxin agonists to dissect auxin perception for plant developmental functions, as well as offering opportunities to discover new molecular players involved in auxin responses.

Copyright © 2019 the Author(s). Published by PNAS.

Address: Department of Forest Genetics and Plant Physiology, Umeå Plant Science Centre, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, SE-901 83 Umeå, Sweden.; Institute of Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, University of Bonn, 53121 Bonn, Germany.; Laboratories for Chemical Biology Umeå, Chemical Biology Consortium Sweden, Department of Chemistry, Umeå University, SE-901 87 Umeå, Sweden.; Centre for Plant Sciences, University of Leeds, LS2 9JT Leeds, United Kingdom.; Department of Plant Biology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, The Linnean Centre for Plant Biology in Uppsala, SE-75007 Uppsala, Sweden.; Laboratory of Growth Regulators, Institute of Experimental Botany, The Czech Academy of Sciences, CZ-78371 Olomouc, Czech Republic.; Laboratory of Growth Regulators, Faculty of Science, Palacký University, CZ-78371 Olomouc, Czech Republic.; Sup'Biotech, IONIS Education Group, 94800 Villejuif, France.; Section of Cell and Developmental Biology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093-0116.; Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of California, Davis, CA 95616.; Department of Plant Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, Ghent University, 9052 Ghent, Belgium.; Center for Plant Systems Biology, Vlaams Instituut voor Biotechnologie, 9052 Ghent, Belgium.; Department of Forest Genetics and Plant Physiology, Umeå Plant Science Centre, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, SE-901 83 Umeå, Sweden; [email protected].
Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.