Measuring tissue sodium concentration: Cross-vendor repeatability and reproducibility of Na-MRI across two sites.

Frank Riemer, Damien McHugh, Fulvio Zaccagna, Daniel Lewis, Mary A McLean, Martin J Graves, Fiona J Gilbert, Geoff J M Parker, Ferdia A Gallagher

Journal: Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI 2020;50(4):1278-1284

PMID: 30859655

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Sodium MRI ( Na-MRI)-derived biomarkers such as total sodium concentration (TSC) have the potential to provide information on tumor cellularity and the changes in tumor microstructure that occur following therapy.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the repeatability and reproducibility of TSC measurements in the brains of healthy volunteers, providing evidence for the technical validation of Na-MRI-derived biomarkers.

STUDY TYPE

Prospective multicenter study.

SUBJECTS

Eleven volunteers (32 ± 6 years; eight males, three females) were scanned twice at each of two sites.

FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE

Comparable 3D-cones Na-MRI ultrashort echo time acquisitions at 3T.

ASSESSMENT

TSC values, quantified from calibration phantoms placed in the field of view, were obtained from white matter (WM), gray matter (GM), and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), based on automated segmentation of coregistered H T -weighted images and hand-drawn regions of interest by two readers.

STATISTICAL TESTS

Coefficients of variation (CoVs) from mean TSC values were used to assess intrasite repeatability and intersite reproducibility.

RESULTS

Mean GM TSC concentrations (52.1 ± 7.1 mM) were ∼20% higher than for WM (41.8 ± 6.7 mM). Measurements were highly repeatable at both sites with mean scan-rescan CoVs between volunteers and regions of 2% and 4%, respectively. Mean intersite reproducibility CoVs were 3%, 3%, and 6% for WM, GM, and CSF, respectively.

DATA CONCLUSION

These results demonstrate technical validation of sodium MRI-derived biomarkers in healthy volunteers. We also show that comparable Na imaging of the brain can be implemented across different sites and scanners with excellent repeatability and reproducibility.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

1 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019;50:1278-1284.

© 2019 The Authors. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.

Address: Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.; CRUK & EPSRC Cancer Imaging Centre in Cambridge & Manchester, UK.; Division of Neuroscience & Experimental Psychology, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.; Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.; Bioxydyn Ltd., Manchester, UK.
Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.