Effect of oral phytoestrogens on endometrial thickness and breast density of perimenopausal and postmenopausal women: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Evangelia Mareti, Christina Abatzi, Dimitrios Vavilis, Irene Lambrinoudaki, Dimitrios G Goulis

Journal: Maturitas 2019;124():81-88

PMID: 31097185

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Phytoestrogens constitute an alternative, non-pharmacologic approach for the management of menopausal symptoms. However, few studies have focused on their safety, specifically in relation to endometrial thickness and breast density.

AIM

To systematically search for and quantitatively synthesize the evidence regarding the effect of phytoestrogens on endometrial thickness and breast density in perimenopausal and postmenopausal women.

METHODS

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) examining the effect of phytoestrogens compared with placebo or menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) on endometrial thickness and/or breast density in perimenopausal or postmenopausal women were searched for in the MEDLINE, CENTRAL and Scopus databases as well as "gray literature" sources until October 31, 2018. Main outcomes were the change from baseline in endometrial thickness and breast density. Statistical analysis was performed with RevMan 5.3, using R language and Open Meta-Analyst software.

RESULTS

The meta-analysis for endometrial thickness included 30 RCTs (with a total of 3497 women), and that for breast density four RCTs (with a total of 674 women). Phytoestrogens did not affect endometrial thickness compared with placebo [weighted mean difference (WMD) -0.04 mm, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.18 to 0.11, I 66%] or MHT (WMD -1.40 mm, 95% CI -2.98 to 0.18, I 84%). In addition, phytoestrogens did not affect breast density compared with placebo [standardized mean difference (SMD) -0.76, 95% CI -1.54 to 0.2, I 95%).

CONCLUSION

Phytoestrogens have no effect on endometrial thickness or breast density, when administered at various doses and for various durations, in perimenopausal and postmenopausal women. However, the high heterogeneity of the studies makes it necessary to conduct RCTs with less risk of systematic error.

Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Address: Unit of Reproductive Endocrinology, 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece. Electronic address: [email protected].; Unit of Reproductive Endocrinology, 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.; 2nd Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.