Evaluation of aspartame cancer epidemiology studies based on quality appraisal criteria.

Lois Haighton, Ashley Roberts, Tomas Jonaitis, Barry Lynch

Journal: Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP 2019;103():352-362

PMID: 30716379

Abstract

Given the widespread use of the low-calorie sweetener aspartame over the last 30 years, the current work was undertaken to evaluate aspartame epidemiology studies looking at cancer endpoints against quality appraisal criteria. The quality appraisal tool used was from the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute (NHLBI) of the National Institute of Health. Studies identified included nine case-control studies and five prospective cohort studies. Most studies assessed low-calorie or diet beverages rather than aspartame intake specifically; however, common use of aspartame in diet sodas does allow for some general extrapolation of results. Following consideration of study quality, two case-control and five prospective studies were considered to meet the majority of the NHLBI criteria. The primary limitation of the other case-control studies was an inadequate sample size. Overall, the results of the studies do not support that exposures to low and no-calorie sweeteners and beverages, and by extension aspartame, are associated with an increased risk of cancer in humans.

Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Address: Intertek Regulatory & Scientific Consultancy, 2233 Argentia Rd., Suite 201, Mississauga, ON, L5N 2X7, Canada. Electronic address: [email protected].; Intertek Regulatory & Scientific Consultancy, 2233 Argentia Rd., Suite 201, Mississauga, ON, L5N 2X7, Canada.

Link outs

Subscription / membership required

Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.