Antimicrobial and inflammatory properties of South African clinical Lactobacillus isolates and vaginal probiotics.

Emily Chetwin, Monalisa T Manhanzva, Andrea G Abrahams, Remy Froissart, Hoyam Gamieldien, Heather Jaspan, Shameem Z Jaumdally, Shaun L Barnabas, Smritee Dabee, Anna-Ursula Happel, Desiree Bowers, Lester Davids, Jo-Ann S Passmore, Lindi Masson

Journal: Scientific reports 2020;9(1):1917

PMID: 30760770

Abstract

Bacterial vaginosis (BV) causes genital inflammation and increased HIV acquisition risk. The standard-of-care for BV, antibiotic therapy, is associated with high recurrence rates. Probiotics may improve treatment outcomes, although substantial heterogeneity in efficacy has been observed during clinical trials. To evaluate the potential to improve existing probiotics, we compared the inflammatory and antimicrobial (adhesion, HO, D-lactate and L-lactate production) characteristics of 23 vaginal Lactobacillus isolates from South African women, commercial vaginal probiotics (L. casei rhamnosus, L. acidophilus) and 4 reference strains. All lactobacilli induced inflammatory cytokine production by genital epithelial cells and produced D-lactate. Of six isolates assessed, five suppressed inflammatory responses to Gardnerella vaginalis. Although the L. acidophilus probiotic was the most adherent, many clinical isolates produced greater amounts of HO, D-lactate and L-lactate than the probiotics. The most L-lactate and HO were produced by L. jensenii (adjusted p = 0.0091) and L. mucosae (adjusted p = 0.0308) species, respectively. According to the characteristics evaluated, the top 10 isolates included 4 L. jensenii, 2 L. crispatus, 1 L. mucosae, 1 L. vaginalis and the L. acidophilus probiotic. There is potential to develop an improved vaginal probiotic using clinical Lactobacillus isolates. Inflammatory profiles are critical to evaluate as some isolates induced substantial cytokine production.

Address: Institute of Infectious Disease and Molecular Medicine (IDM), University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.; UMR 5290 MIVEGEC, French National Centre for Scientific Research (CNRS), Montpellier, France.; Seattle Children's Research Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.; Department of Human Biology, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.; Centre for the AIDS Programme of Research in South Africa (CAPRISA) Centre of Excellence in HIV Prevention, Durban, South Africa.; National Health Laboratory Service, Cape Town, South Africa.; Institute of Infectious Disease and Molecular Medicine (IDM), University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa. [email protected].; Centre for the AIDS Programme of Research in South Africa (CAPRISA) Centre of Excellence in HIV Prevention, Durban, South Africa. [email protected].
Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.