Scientific Integrity Principles and Best Practices: Recommendations from a Scientific Integrity Consortium.

Alison Kretser, Delia Murphy, Stefano Bertuzzi, Todd Abraham, David B Allison, Kathryn J Boor, Johanna Dwyer, Andrea Grantham, Linda J Harris, Rachelle Hollander, Chavonda Jacobs-Young, Sarah Rovito, Dorothea Vafiadis, Catherine Woteki, Jessica Wyndham, Rickey Yada

Journal: Science and engineering ethics 2019;25(2):327-355

PMID: 30810892

Abstract

A Scientific Integrity Consortium developed a set of recommended principles and best practices that can be used broadly across scientific disciplines as a mechanism for consensus on scientific integrity standards and to better equip scientists to operate in a rapidly changing research environment. The two principles that represent the umbrella under which scientific processes should operate are as follows: (1) Foster a culture of integrity in the scientific process. (2) Evidence-based policy interests may have legitimate roles to play in influencing aspects of the research process, but those roles should not interfere with scientific integrity. The nine best practices for instilling scientific integrity in the implementation of these two overarching principles are (1) Require universal training in robust scientific methods, in the use of appropriate experimental design and statistics, and in responsible research practices for scientists at all levels, with the training content regularly updated and presented by qualified scientists. (2) Strengthen scientific integrity oversight and processes throughout the research continuum with a focus on training in ethics and conduct. (3) Encourage reproducibility of research through transparency. (4) Strive to establish open science as the standard operating procedure throughout the scientific enterprise. (5) Develop and implement educational tools to teach communication skills that uphold scientific integrity. (6) Strive to identify ways to further strengthen the peer review process. (7) Encourage scientific journals to publish unanticipated findings that meet standards of quality and scientific integrity. (8) Seek harmonization and implementation among journals of rapid, consistent, and transparent processes for correction and/or retraction of published papers. (9) Design rigorous and comprehensive evaluation criteria that recognize and reward the highest standards of integrity in scientific research.

Address: ILSI North America, Washington, DC, USA. [email protected].; ILSI North America, Washington, DC, USA.; Kellan, Washington, DC, USA.; American Society for Microbiology, Washington, DC, USA.; Formerly of the ILSI Global Board of Trustees, Washington, DC, USA.; Indiana University School of Public Health, Bloomington, IN, USA.; Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.; Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.; Canadian Nutrition Society, Ottawa, ON, Canada.; International Association for Food Protection, Des Moines, IA, USA.; University of California, Davis, CA, USA.; Formerly of The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, The National Academy of Engineering, Center for Engineering Ethics and Society, Washington, DC, USA.; U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Beltsville, MD, USA.; Association of Public and Land-Grant Universities, Washington, DC, USA.; American Heart Association, Washington, DC, USA.; National Council on Aging, Arlington, VA, USA.; Department of Food Science and Human Nutrition, Iowa State University (Formerly of the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Research, Education, and Economics), Ames, IA, USA.; American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington, DC, USA.; University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.