Ohara Augusto, Sara Goldstein, James K Hurst, Johan Lind, Sergei V Lymar, Gabor Merenyi, Rafael Radi
Journal: Free radical biology & medicine 2020;135():210-215
PMID: 30818056
Peroxynitrite, ONOO, formed in tissues that are simultaneously generating NO and O, is widely regarded as a major contributor to oxidative stress. Many of the reactions involved are catalyzed by CO via formation of an unstable adduct, ONOOC(O)O, that undergoes O-O bond homolysis to produce NO and CO radicals, whose yields are equal at about 0.33 with respect to the ONOO reactant. Since its inception two decades ago, this radical-based mechanism has been frequently but unsuccessfully challenged. The most recent among these [Serrano-Luginbuehl et al. Chem. Res. Toxicol.31:721-730; 2018] claims that ONOOC(O)O is stable, predicts a yield of NO/CO of less than 0.01 under physiological conditions and, contrary to widely accepted viewpoints, suggests that radical generation is inconsequential to peroxynitrite-induced oxidative damage. Here we review the experimental and theoretical evidence that support the radical model and show this recently proposed alternative mechanism to be incorrect.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Full Text Sources:
© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence
We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.