Tai chi for treating osteopenia and primary osteoporosis: a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.

Yili Zhang, Yan Chai, Xiaojie Pan, Hao Shen, Xu Wei, Yanming Xie

Journal: Clinical interventions in aging 2019;14():91-104

PMID: 30655662

Abstract

PURPOSE

The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the efficacy of Tai chi (TC) as an adjuvant treatment for osteopenia and primary osteoporosis.

METHODS

We went through eight databases to identify relevant randomized controlled trials that compared TC with a control group. The primary outcome was osteoporosis-related fractures (fracture incidence). Meta-analyses and trial sequential analyses (TSA) were conducted using RevMan 5.3 and TSA 0.9.

RESULTS

Fifteen randomized controlled trials involving a total of 857 patients were included in the analyses. No trials reported primary outcome; however, bone mineral density (BMD) values differed significantly in subgroup 1 (TC vs no treatment; weighted mean difference [WMD] =0.05 g/cm, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.07; <0.00001; for heterogeneity =0.22, =22%) and subgroup 2 (TC vs conventional treatments; WMD =0.16 g/cm, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.21; <0.00001; for heterogeneity =0.008, =75%). In addition, two trials compared TC with conventional treatments, which found a significant difference in bone gla protein (standardized mean difference =-1.18, 95% CI -1.66 to -0.70; <0.00001; for heterogeneity =0.58, =75%). The results of the BMD were confirmed by TSA. Also, TC may have a certain effect on the relief of osteoporotic pain (WMD = -2.61, 95% CI -3.51 to -1.71; WMD = -1.39, 95% CI -2.01 to -0.77). However, it did not promote the quality of life, level of serum calcium, serum phosphorus, and also had no effect on bone turnover markers.

CONCLUSION

Although there is no study monitoring fracture incidence, TC may be beneficial for patients in improving BMD values, level of bone gla protein, and relieving osteoporotic pain. However, due to the low methodological quality, current evidence for treating osteopenia and primary osteoporosis through TC is insufficient.

Address: Institute of Basic Research in Clinical Medicine, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China, [email protected].; School of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.; Department of Epidemiology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.; Department of Human Nutrition and Health, Wageningen University and Health, Wageningen, The Netherlands.; Department of Scientific Research, Wangjing Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China, [email protected].
Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.