Twenty-Four-Hour Diet recall and Diet records compared with 24-hour urinary excretion to predict an individual's sodium consumption: A Systematic Review.

Rachael M McLean, Victoria L Farmer, Alice Nettleton, Claire M Cameron, Nancy R Cook, Mark Woodward, Norman R C Campbell

Journal: Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) 2019;20(10):1360-1376

PMID: 30298972

Abstract

This systematic literature review aimed to investigate whether 24 hour diet recall and diet records are reliable and valid ways to measure usual dietary sodium intake compared with 24 hour urinary assessment. We searched electronic databases Medline, Embase, Cinahl, Lilacs, Google Scholar and the Cochrane Library using pre-defined terms Studies were eligible for inclusion if they assessed adult humans in free-living settings, and if they included dietary assessment and 24 hours urinary collection for assessment of sodium intake in the same participants. Studies that included populations with an active disease state that might interfere with normal sodium metabolism were excluded. Results of 20 studies using 24 hour diet recall recall (including 14 validation studies) and 10 studies using food records (including six validation studies) are included in this review. Correlations between estimates from dietary assessment and urinary excretion ranged from 0.16 to 0.72 for 24 hour diet recall, and 0.11 to 0.49 for food diaries. Bland-Altman analysis in two studies of 24 hour diet recall showed poor agreement with 24 hours urinary sodium excretion. These results show that 24 hour diet recall and diet records inaccurately measure dietary sodium intake in individuals compared with the gold standard 24 hours urinary excretion. Validation studies of dietary assessment methods should include multiple days of assessment and 24 hours urine collection, use relevant food composition databases and Bland-Altman methods of analysis.

©2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Address: Department of Preventive & Social Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.; Department of Human Nutrition, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.; Biostatistics Unit, Dean's Office, Dunedin School of Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.; Department of Medicine, Division of Preventive Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.; The George Institute for Global Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.; The George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.; Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.; Libin Cardiovascular Institute of Alberta, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.