The Influence of Daily Stress on Sedentary Behavior: Group and Person (N of 1) Level Results of a 1-Year Observational Study.

Keith M Diaz, Anusorn Thanataveerat, Faith E Parsons, Sunmoo Yoon, Ying Kuen Cheung, Carmela Alcántara, Andrea T Duran, Ipek Ensari, David J Krupka, Joseph E Schwartz, Matthew M Burg, Karina W Davidson

Journal: Psychosomatic medicine 2019;80(7):620-627

PMID: 29846309

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study, which used mobile technologies to continuously collect data for 1 year, was to examine the association of psychological stress with objectively measured sedentary behavior in adults at both the group (e.g., nomothetic approach) and individual (e.g., idiographic approach) level.

METHODS

Data were collected in an observational study of healthy adults (n = 79) residing in the New York City metro area who were studied for 365 days from 2014 to 2015. Sedentary behavior was objectively measured via accelerometry. A smartphone-based electronic diary was used to assess level of stress ("Overall, how stressful was your day?" 0-10 scale) and sources of stress.

RESULTS

The end-of-day stress rating was not associated with total sedentary time (B = -1.34, p = .767) at the group level. When specific sources of stress were evaluated at the group level, argument-related stress was associated with increased sedentariness, whereas running late- and work-related stress were associated with decreased sedentariness. There was a substantial degree of interindividual variability in the relationship of stress with sedentary behavior. Both the level and sources of stress were associated with increased sedentariness for some, decreased sedentariness for others, and had no effect for many (within-person variance p < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that the influence of stress on sedentary behavior varies by source of stress and from person to person. A precision medicine approach may be warranted to target reductions in sedentary time, although further studies are needed to confirm the observed findings in light of study limitations including a small sample size and enrollment of participants from a single, urban metropolitan area.

Address: From the Center for Behavioral Cardiovascular Health (Diaz, Thanataveerat, Parsons, Duran, Ensari, Krupka, Schwartz, Davidson), Columbia University Medical Center, New York; Department of Biostatistics (Thanataveerat, Cheung), Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York; School of Nursing (Yoon), Columbia University, New York; School of Social Work (Alcántara), Columbia University, New York; Teachers College (Duran), Columbia University, New York; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science (Schwartz), Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY; Department of Internal Medicine (Burg), Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut; and New York Presbyterian Hospital (Davidson), New York.
Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.