Antonio Coutinho Madruga-Neto, Wanderley Marques Bernardo, Diogo Turiani Hourneaux de Moura, Vitor Ottoboni Brunaldi, Rafael Krieger Martins, Iatagan Rocha Josino, Eduardo Turiani Hourneaux de Moura, Thiago Ferreira de Souza, Marco Aurélio Santo, Eduardo Guimarães Hourneaux de Moura
Journal: Obesity surgery 2019;28(9):2932-2940
PMID: 29909512
Endoscopic bariatric therapies (EBTs) are promising alternatives to conventional surgery for obesity. The aim of this study is to compare efficacy and safety through a systematic review and meta-analysis of the endoscopic gastroplasty techniques versus conservative treatment. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane CENTRAL, Lilacs/Bireme. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) enrolling obese patients comparing endoscopic gastroplasty to sham or diet/exercise were considered eligible. Among 6014 records, three RCTs were selected for meta-analysis. The total sample was 459 patients (312 EBTs vs 147 control). Mean total body weight loss in the intervention group (IG) was 4.8% higher than the control group (CG) at 12 months (p = 0.01). The IG responder rate was 44.31% at 12 months. Therefore, the endoscopic gastroplasty is more effective than conservative therapies but do not achieve FDA thresholds.
Medical:
Other Literature Sources:
Full Text Sources:
© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence
We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.