Variation in anticoagulation for atrial fibrillation between English clinical commissioning groups: an observational study.

John Robson, Kate Homer, Zaheer Ahmed, Sotiris Antoniou

Journal: The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners 2019;68(673):e551-e558

PMID: 29970397

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Despite improvement in anticoagulation for atrial fibrillation (AF), substantial variation in anticoagulation persists between clinical commissioning groups (CCGs) and regions in England.

AIM

To identify reasons for variation between English CCGs in anticoagulation for AF.

DESIGN AND SETTING

A 4-year observational study from 2012/2013 to 2015/2016, of the national Quality and Outcomes Framework.

METHOD

Multiple regression and Pearson's correlation coefficients were used to analyse anticoagulation for AF in relation to older age, Index of Multiple Deprivation, prescription of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs), and exception reporting, as well as stroke hospital admission and mortality.

RESULTS

The proportion of eligible patients in England prescribed anticoagulants for AF without exceptions for clinical complexity or patient dissent increased from 65.1% in 2012/2013 to 77.9% in 2015/2016. In 2015, 290 920 additional eligible people were anticoagulated in association with use of the CHADSVASc rather than CHADS score. From 2012 to 2015, exception reporting almost halved from 20% to 10.2%. Variation in CCG anticoagulation was not associated with deprivation or NOAC use. There was a strong negative association between exception reporting representing patient complexity and anticoagulation performance, accounting for 57% of the variation in anticoagulation without exceptions (multiple regression coefficient = -0.81; 95% confidence intervals = -0.92 to -0.71; <0.001).

CONCLUSION

Anticoagulation for AF has improved substantially in England in association with considerable increases in the eligible population as a result of decreased exception reporting and the use of the CHADSVASc score. There is still substantial room for improvement in most CCGs because, even allowing for exceptions, nine out of 10 CCGs failed to achieve 90% anticoagulation.

© British Journal of General Practice 2018.

Address: Centre for Primary Care and Public Health, Queen Mary University of London, London.; Barts Health NHS Trust, London.
Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.