Safety and efficacy of apixaban versus warfarin in patients with end-stage renal disease: Meta-analysis.

Ronpichai Chokesuwattanaskul, Charat Thongprayoon, Tanyanan Tanawuttiwat, Wisit Kaewput, Pavida Pachariyanon, Wisit Cheungpasitporn

Journal: Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE 2019;41(6):627-634

PMID: 29577340

Abstract

BACKGROUND

At the present, apixaban is the only nonvitamin K oral anticoagulant approved by the Food and Drug Administration for use with patients with creatinine clearance <15 mL/min or end-stage renal disease (ESRD). However, the recommendations are based on pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data and there was lack of clinical trial evidence. We aimed to assess safety and efficacy of apixaban in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) or ESRD.

METHODS

Databases were searched through November 2017. Studies that reported incidence or odd ratios of bleeding complications or thromboembolic events in the use of apixaban in patients with CKD stage 4-5 or ESRD on dialysis were included. Effect estimates from the individual study were extracted and combined using random-effect, generic inverse variance method of DerSimonian and Laird.

RESULTS

Five studies were included into the analysis consisting of 43,850 patients in observational cohort studies. The majority of patients (87%) used apixaban for atrial fibrillation. The pooled estimated incidence of any bleeding complications on apixaban was 17.4% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 13.0%-23.0%). Compared to warfarin, apixaban was significantly associated with reduced risk of major bleeding (pooled odds ratio [OR], 0.42; 95% CI, 0.28-0.61). In studies in ESRD patients on dialysis, the pooled OR of major bleeding was 0.27 (95% CI, 0.07-0.95). There was no significant difference in risk of thromboembolic events in advanced CKD or ESRD patients on apixaban versus vitamin K antagonists (pooled OR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.23-1.39).

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with advanced CKD and ESRD, the use of apixaban was associated with lower risk of major bleeding compared to warfarin, and was found to be relatively effective with no excess risk of thromboembolic events.

© 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Address: Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University and King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.; Department of Internal Medicine, Bassett Medical Center, Cooperstown, NY, USA.; Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS, USA.; Department of Military and Community Medicine, Phramongkutklao College of Medicine, Bangkok, Thailand.; Department of Internal Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, TX, USA.; Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS, USA.
Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.