Assessment of the impact of three pesticides on microbial dynamics and functions in a lab-to-field experimental approach.

P A Karas, C Baguelin, G Pertile, E S Papadopoulou, S Nikolaki, V Storck, F Ferrari, M Trevisan, A Ferrarini, F Fornasier, S Vasileiadis, G Tsiamis, F Martin-Laurent, D G Karpouzas

Journal: The Science of the total environment 2019;637-638():636-646

PMID: 29758420

Abstract

The toxicity of pesticides on soil microorganisms is as an emerging area of concern. Novel and well-standardized tools could be now used to provide a robust assessment of the ecotoxicity of pesticides on soil microorganisms. We followed a tiered lab-to-field approach to assess the toxicity of three pesticides, widely used at EU level, (chlorpyrifos (CHL), isoproturon (IPU) and tebuconazole (TBZ)) on (i) the abundance of 11 microbial taxa and 8 functional microbial groups via q-PCR and (ii) the activity of enzymes involved in biogeochemical cycles via fluorometric analysis. Correlation of microbial measurements with the concentration of pesticides, and their transformation products (TPs) in soil enabled the identification of the compounds driving the effects observed. At lab tests (×1, ×2 and ×10 the recommended dose), CHL and TBZ significantly reduced the relative abundance of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria (AOB) and archaea (AOA) which recovered by the end of the study, while all pesticides induced a persistent reduction in the relative abundance of sulfur-oxidizing bacteria (SOB). The two demethylated metabolites of IPU (MD-IPU and DD-IPU) adversely affected P-cycling enzymes and leucine aminopeptidase (Leu). At field tests (×1, ×2 and ×5 the recommended dose), a persistent reduction on the relative abundance of AOA was induced by all pesticides, but only CHL and its hydrolysis product 3,5,6 trichloro-2-pyridynol (TCP) soil levels were negatively correlated with AOA relative abundance. Our findings suggest that ammonia-oxidizing microorganisms constitute the most responsive microbial group to pesticides and could be potential candidates for inclusion in pesticide risk assessment.

Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Address: University of Thessaly, Department of Biochemistry and Biotechnology, Laboratory of Plant and Environmental Biotechnology, Larissa 41500, Viopolis, Greece.; ENOVEO, Lyon, France.; Universita Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Istituto di Chimica Agraria ed Ambientale, Piacenza 29122, Italy; Aeiforia srl, Spinoff Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Fidenza, Italy.; Department of Environmental and Natural Resources Management, University of Patras, Agrinio, Greece.; Agroécologie, AgroSup Dijon, INRA, Univ. Bourgogne, Franche-Comté, F-21000 Dijon, France.; Aeiforia srl, Spinoff Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Fidenza, Italy.; Universita Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Istituto di Chimica Agraria ed Ambientale, Piacenza 29122, Italy.; Universita Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Department of Sustainable Crop Production, Piacenza 29122, Italy.; CREA - Centro Viticoltura ed Enologia, Via Trieste 23, 34170 Gorizia, Italy.; University of Thessaly, Department of Biochemistry and Biotechnology, Laboratory of Plant and Environmental Biotechnology, Larissa 41500, Viopolis, Greece. Electronic address: [email protected].

Link outs

Subscription / membership required

Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.