Donald M Mock, Demet Nalbant, Svetlana V Kyosseva, Robert L Schmidt, Guohua An, Nell I Matthews, Alexander P J Vlaar, Robin van Bruggen, Dirk de Korte, Ronald G Strauss, José A Cancelas, Robert S Franco, Peter Veng-Pedersen, John A Widness
Journal: Transfusion 2019;58(8):2068-2081
PMID: 29770455
The current reference method in the United States for measuring in vivo population red blood cell (RBC) kinetics utilizes chromium-51 ( Cr) RBC labeling for determining RBC volume, 24-hour posttransfusion RBC recovery, and long-term RBC survival. Here we provide evidence supporting adoption of a method for kinetics that uses the biotin-labeled RBCs (BioRBCs) as a superior, versatile method for both regulatory and investigational purposes. RBC kinetic analysis using BioRBCs has important methodologic, analytical, and safety advantages over Cr-labeled RBCs. We critically review recent advances in labeling human RBCs at multiple and progressively lower biotin label densities for concurrent, accurate, and sensitive determination of both autologous and allogeneic RBC population kinetics. BioRBC methods valid for RBC kinetic studies, including successful variations used by the authors, are presented along with pharmacokinetic modeling approaches for the accurate determination of RBC pharmacokinetic variables in health and disease. The advantages and limitations of the BioRBC method-including its capability of determining multiple BioRBC densities simultaneously in the same individual throughout the entire RBC life span-are presented and compared with the Cr method. Finally, potential applications and limitations of kinetic BioRBC determinations are discussed.
© 2018 AABB.
Full Text Sources:
Other Literature Sources:
© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence
We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.