Phase II Study of Irinotecan Plus Panitumumab as Second-Line Therapy for Patients with Advanced Esophageal Adenocarcinoma.

Harry Yoon, Lilit Karapetyan, Anita Choudhary, Ramla Kosozi, Gurvinder Singh Bali, Ali H Zaidi, Ajlan Atasoy, Arlene A Forastiere, Michael K Gibson

Journal: The oncologist 2019;23(9):1004-e102

PMID: 29769385

Abstract

LESSON LEARNED

Panitumumab plus irinotecan is not active for the treatment of esophageal adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND

Esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) is a lethal cancer with increasing incidence. Panitumumab (Pa) is a fully humanized IgG2 monoclonal antibody against human EGFR. Cetuximab (Cx) combined with irinotecan (Ir) is active for second-line treatment of colorectal cancer. This phase II study was designed to evaluate Pa plus Ir as second-line therapy for advanced EAC.

METHODS

The primary endpoint was response rate (RR). Patients with one prior treatment were given Pa 9 mg/m on day 1 and Ir 125 mg/m on days 1 and 8 of each 21-day cycle. Inclusion criteria were confirmed EAC, measurable disease, no prior Ir or Pa, performance status <2, and normal organ function.

RESULTS

Twenty-four patients were enrolled; 18 were eligible and evaluable. These patients were all white, with a median age of 62.5 years (range, 33-79 years), and included 15 men and 3 women. The median number of cycles was 3.5. The most common grade 1-2 adverse events were fatigue, diarrhea, anemia, leukopenia, and hypoalbuminemia. Grade 3-4 adverse events included hematologic, gastrointestinal, electrolyte, rash, fatigue, and weight loss. The median follow-up was 7.2 months (range, 2.3-14 months). There were no complete remissions. The partial response rate was 6% (1/18; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.01-0.26). The clinical benefit (partial response [PR] plus stable disease [SD]) rate was 50%. The median overall survival was 7.2 months (95% CI, 4.1-8.9) with an 11.1% 1-year survival rate. The median progression-free survival was 2.9 months (95% CI, 1.6-5.3).

CONCLUSION

Irinotecan and panitumumab as second-line treatment for advanced EAC are not active.

© AlphaMed Press; the data published online to support this summary are the property of the authors.

Address: Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.; Department of Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA.; Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, USA.; Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.; Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.; Bristol-Myers Squibb Oncology, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA.; Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.; Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA [email protected].
Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.