Organization of area hV5/MT+ in subjects with homonymous visual field defects.

Amalia Papanikolaou, Georgios A Keliris, T Dorina Papageorgiou, Ulrich Schiefer, Nikos K Logothetis, Stelios M Smirnakis

Journal: NeuroImage 2020;190():254-268

PMID: 29627591

Abstract

Damage to the primary visual cortex (V1) leads to a visual field loss (scotoma) in the retinotopically corresponding part of the visual field. Nonetheless, a small amount of residual visual sensitivity persists within the blind field. This residual capacity has been linked to activity observed in the middle temporal area complex (V5/MT+). However, it remains unknown whether the organization of hV5/MT+ changes following early visual cortical lesions. We studied the organization of area hV5/MT+ of five patients with dense homonymous defects in a quadrant of the visual field as a result of partial V1+ or optic radiation lesions. To do so, we developed a new method, which models the boundaries of population receptive fields directly from the BOLD signal of each voxel in the visual cortex. We found responses in hV5/MT+ arising inside the scotoma for all patients and identified two possible sources of activation: 1) responses might originate from partially lesioned parts of area V1 corresponding to the scotoma, and 2) responses can also originate independent of area V1 input suggesting the existence of functional V1-bypassing pathways. Apparently, visually driven activity observed in hV5/MT+ is not sufficient to mediate conscious vision. More surprisingly, visually driven activity in corresponding regions of V1 and early extrastriate areas including hV5/MT+ did not guarantee visual perception in the group of patients with post-geniculate lesions that we examined. This suggests that the fine coordination of visual activity patterns across visual areas may be an important determinant of whether visual perception persists following visual cortical lesions.

Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Address: Institute of Behavioural Neuroscience, Department of Experimental Psychology, University College London, London WC1H 0AP, UK; Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany. Electronic address: [email protected].; Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany; Bio-Imaging Lab, University of Antwerp, 2610 Wilrijk, Belgium; Bernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany.; Department of Neurology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA; Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA; Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering, George R. Brown School of Engineering, Rice University, TX 77005 USA.; Center for Ophthalmology, University of Tuebingen, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany; Competence Center Vision Research, Study Course "Ophthalmic Optics", Faculty of Optics & Mechatronics, University of Applied Sciences, Aalen, Germany.; Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany; Division of Imaging Science and Biomedical Engineering, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PT, UK.; Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Jamaica Plain VA Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. Electronic address: [email protected].
Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.