Chronic spontaneous urticaria in children - a systematic review on interventions and comorbidities.

Hélène Cornillier, Bruno Giraudeau, Stéphane Munck, Florence Hacard, Annie-Pierre Jonville-Bera, Gwenaëlle d'Acremont, Bach-Nga Pham, Annabel Maruani

Journal: Pediatric allergy and immunology : official publication of the European Society of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology 2018;29(3):303-310

PMID: 29392757

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) is not frequent in children. Management guidelines have been developed for adults and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) included teenagers aged 12-18, but data for children under age 12 are limited. We performed a systematic review to assess comorbidities in children <12 years old with CSU and the efficacy and safety of treatments.

METHODS

We searched for original articles of epidemiologic and treatment data in children <12 years old with CSU that were published from 2005 to July 2016 in MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, and LILACS. Article selection and data extraction were performed in duplicate.

RESULTS

Our systematic review included 9 reports on epidemiologic data (633 children). Five comorbidities and laboratory anomalies associated with CSU found were atopy (28.1%), positive autologous serum skin test (36.8%), thyroid biologic anomalies (6.4%) and detectable antinuclear antigen (10.4%), seroprevalence for Helicobacter pylori (21.1%), low vitamin D level (69.1%), and psychiatric disorders (70.4%). Only one study allowed for comparison with a control group. Our review included 10 studies (322 children), describing 5 different drug families, mostly H1-antihistamines (n = 297). One randomized controlled study compared single-dose rupatadine with single-dose desloratadine and placebo. Cyclosporine was effective and had no adverse effects in 18 children. Omalizumab, montelukast, and cefuroxime were reported in very small series (5, 1, and 1 patients).

CONCLUSIONS

H1-antihistamines are effective for CSU in children <12 years old, with reassuring safety data at licensed doses. Cyclosporine seems effective, but the level of evidence is low.

© 2018 EAACI and John Wiley and Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd.

Address: Department of Dermatology, University François Rabelais Tours, CHRU Tours, Tours Cedex 9, France.; SPHERE - INSERM 1246, University of Tours and Nantes, Tours, France.; Department of Teaching and Research in General Practice, University Nice Sophia Antipolis, Nice, France.; Department of Allergology and Immunology, University Hospital Center of Lyon, Lyon, France.; SPHERE - INSERM 1246, University of Tours and Nantes, Tours, France.; Department of Clinical Pharmacology, CHRU Tours, Tours Cedex 9, France.; Pediatric office, Paris, France.; Laboratory of Immunology, University Hospital Centre of Reims, Reims, France.; Department of Dermatology, University François Rabelais Tours, CHRU Tours, Tours Cedex 9, France.; SPHERE - INSERM 1246, University of Tours and Nantes, Tours, France.

Link outs

Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.