Structural Equation Modeling to Explore Patient to Staff Ratios as an Explanatory Factor for Variation in Dialysis Facility Outcomes.

Rosa K Hand, Jeffrey M Albert, Ashwini R Sehgal

Journal: Journal of renal nutrition : the official journal of the Council on Renal Nutrition of the National Kidney Foundation 2019;28(5):309-316

PMID: 29615306

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Patient to staff ratios vary based on facility characteristics, and therefore have been proposed as an explanatory factor for the variation in dialysis facility outcomes. This analysis tested that hypothesis.

DESIGN AND METHODS

Observational study using Dialysis Facility Report data. Reported staff numbers from the Annual Facility Survey were converted to full time equivalents (FTE). Subsequently, ratios were created for patients per FTE registered dietitian (RD), social worker, nurse, and patient care technician. Bivariate associations and structural equation modeling (SEM) were used to explore relationships between these ratios and patient outcomes: standardized mortality ratio and standardized hospitalization rate, when also considering the impact of non-modifiable facility characteristics (region, chain, profit status). Our focus was on RD staffing; therefore we also included serum phosphorus and normalized protein catabolic ratio in the model, and also conducted a sub-analysis of the 198 facilities that exceeded the KDOQI maximum of 150 patients:FTE RD.

SUBJECTS

Dialysis centers in the US with at least 30 adult patients and no pediatric patients. 4035 facilities had complete data for the proposed variables.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Standardized mortality ratio and standardized hospitalization rate were the primary outcomes.

RESULTS

The mean and standard deviation for patients per FTE staff were 90.0 ± 34.0, 88.7 ± 32.8, 17.1 ± 20.5 and 11.9 ± 7.0 for RDs, social workers, nurses, and technicians, respectively. Facility characteristics impacted staffing in bivariate analyses and SEM. The only significant paths from staffing ratio to outcomes were for patient:FTE social worker to SMR (standardized beta = -0.09, 95% CI -0.13, -0.04) and Patients:FTE RD to SHR Days (standardized beta = 0.04, 95% CI 0.001, 0.09). In the sub-analysis, there were no significant paths from staffing to outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

This study did not provide evidence that patient per staff ratios explain variation in dialysis facility outcomes. While there are some important bivariate relationships, these disappear in more complex models. Future research should investigate the impacts of staffing ratios on individual patients, to overcome the possible ecological fallacy.

Copyright © 2018 National Kidney Foundation, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Address: Instructor, Department of Nutrition and PhD Candidate, Clinical and Translational Science, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio. Electronic address: [email protected].; Professor, Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio.; Professor, Center for Reducing Health Disparities, MetroHealth Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio.
Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.