Regional differences in antihyperglycemic medication are not explained by individual socioeconomic status, regional deprivation, and regional health care services. Observational results from the German DIAB-CORE consortium.

Susanne Moebus, Andrea Icks, Ute Linnenkamp, Lars Kroll, Alexander Kluttig, Saskia Hartwig, Henry Völzke, Sabine Schipf, Karl-Heinz Jöckel, Christina Bächle, Christa Meisinger, Rolf Holle, Ina-Maria Rückert-Eheberg, Michaela Schunk, Teresa Tamayo, Werner Maier, Heiner Claessen

Journal: PloS one 2018;13(1):e0191559

PMID: 29370228

Abstract

AIMS

This population-based study sought to extend knowledge on factors explaining regional differences in type 2 diabetes mellitus medication patterns in Germany.

METHODS

Individual baseline and follow-up data from four regional population-based German cohort studies (SHIP [northeast], CARLA [east], HNR [west], KORA [south]) conducted between 1997 and 2010 were pooled and merged with both data on regional deprivation and regional health care services. To analyze regional differences in any or newer anti-hyperglycemic medication, medication prevalence ratios (PRs) were estimated using multivariable Poisson regression models with a robust error variance adjusted gradually for individual and regional variables.

RESULTS

The study population consisted of 1,437 people aged 45 to 74 years at baseline, (corresponding to 49 to 83 years at follow-up) with self-reported type 2 diabetes. The prevalence of receiving any anti-hyperglycemic medication was 16% higher in KORA (PR 1.16 [1.08-1.25]), 10% higher in CARLA (1.10 [1.01-1.18]), and 7% higher in SHIP (PR 1.07 [1.00-1.15]) than in HNR. The prevalence of receiving newer anti-hyperglycemic medication was 49% higher in KORA (1.49 [1.09-2.05]), 41% higher in CARLA (1.41 [1.02-1.96]) and 1% higher in SHIP (1.01 [0.72-1.41]) than in HNR, respectively. After gradual adjustment for individual variables, regional deprivation and health care services, the effects only changed slightly.

CONCLUSIONS

Neither comprehensive individual factors including socioeconomic status nor regional deprivation or indicators of regional health care services were able to sufficiently explain regional differences in anti-hyperglycemic treatment in Germany. To understand the underlying causes, further research is needed.

Address: Institute for Health Services Research and Health Economics, German Diabetes Centre, Leibniz Center for Diabetes Research at Heinrich-Heine-University, Düsseldorf, Germany.; German Center for Diabetes Research (DZD), München-Neuherberg, Germany.; Institute of Health Economics and Health Care Management, Helmholtz Zentrum München, German Research Center for Environmental Health, Neuherberg, Germany.; Institute of Epidemiology II, Helmholtz Zentrum München, German Research Center for Environmental Health, Neuherberg, Germany.; Institute for Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, University Hospital of Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Germany.; Institute for Community Medicine, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.; Institute of Medical Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Informatics, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany.; Department of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.; Institute for Health Services Research and Health Economics, Faculty of Medicine, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.