Cord Blood Lysophosphatidylcholine 16: 1 is Positively Associated with Birth Weight.

Yong-Ping Lu, Christoph Reichetzeder, Cornelia Prehn, Liang-Hong Yin, Chen Yun, Shufei Zeng, Chang Chu, Jerzy Adamski, Berthold Hocher

Journal: Cellular physiology and biochemistry : international journal of experimental cellular physiology, biochemistry, and pharmacology 2018;45(2):614-624

PMID: 29402770

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Impaired birth outcomes, like low birth weight, have consistently been associated with increased disease susceptibility to hypertension in later life. Alterations in the maternal or fetal metabolism might impact on fetal growth and influence birth outcomes. Discerning associations between the maternal and fetal metabolome and surrogate parameters of fetal growth could give new insight into the complex relationship between intrauterine conditions, birth outcomes, and later life disease susceptibility.

METHODS

Using flow injection tandem mass spectrometry, targeted metabolomics was performed in serum samples obtained from 226 mother/child pairs at delivery. Associations between neonatal birth weight and concentrations of 163 maternal and fetal metabolites were analyzed.

RESULTS

After FDR adjustment using the Benjamini-Hochberg procedure lysophosphatidylcholines (LPC) 14: 0, 16: 1, and 18: 1 were strongly positively correlated with birth weight. In a stepwise linear regression model corrected for established confounding factors of birth weight, LPC 16: 1 showed the strongest independent association with birth weight (CI: 93.63 - 168.94; P = 6.94×10-11 ). The association with birth weight was stronger than classical confounding factors such as offspring sex (CI: -258.81- -61.32; P = 0.002) and maternal smoking during pregnancy (CI: -298.74 - -29.51; P = 0.017).

CONCLUSIONS

After correction for multiple testing and adjustment for potential confounders, LPC 16: 1 showed a very strong and independent association with birth weight. The underlying molecular mechanisms linking fetal LPCs with birth weight need to be addressed in future studies.

© 2018 The Author(s). Published by S. Karger AG, Basel.

Address: Institute of Nutritional Science, University of Potsdam, Potsdam-Rehbrücke, Germany.; Department of Nephrology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Mitte, Berlin, Germany.; Department of Nephrology, the first Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.; Institute of Nutritional Science, University of Potsdam, Potsdam-Rehbrücke, Germany.; Institute of Experimental Genetics, Genome Analysis Center, Helmholtz Zentrum München, German Research Center for Environmental Health, Neuherberg, Germany.; Department of Nephrology, the first Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.; Institute of Nutritional Science, University of Potsdam, Potsdam-Rehbrücke, Germany.; Department of Nephrology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Mitte, Berlin, Germany.; Institute of Experimental Genetics, Genome Analysis Center, Helmholtz Zentrum München, German Research Center for Environmental Health, Neuherberg, Germany.; Lehrstuhl für Experimentelle Genetik, Technische Universität München, Freising-Weihenstephan, Germany.; German Center for Diabetes Research, München-Neuherberg, Germany.; Institute of Nutritional Science, University of Potsdam, Potsdam-Rehbrücke, Germany.; Department of Histology and Embryology, Basic Medical College, Guangzhou, China.; Key Laboratory of Study and Discovery of Small Targeted Molecules of Hunan Province, School of Medicine, Hunan Normal University, Changsha, China.

Link outs

Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.