Chemotherapy-Related Cardiac Dysfunction: A Systematic Review of Genetic Variants Modulating Individual Risk.

Marijke Linschoten, Arco J Teske, Maarten J Cramer, Elsken van der Wall, Folkert W Asselbergs

Journal: Circulation. Genomic and precision medicine 2019;11(1):e001753

PMID: 29557343

Abstract

Chemotherapy-related cardiac dysfunction is a significant side effect of anticancer treatment. Risk stratification is based on clinical- and treatment-related risk factors that do not adequately explain individual susceptibility. The addition of genetic variants may improve risk assessment. We conducted a systematic literature search in PubMed and Embase, to identify studies investigating genetic risk factors for chemotherapy-related cardiac dysfunction. Included were articles describing genetic variants in humans altering susceptibility to chemotherapy-related cardiac dysfunction. The validity of identified studies was assessed by 10 criteria, including assessment of population stratification, statistical methodology, and replication of findings. We identified 40 studies: 34 exploring genetic risk factors for anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity (n=9678) and 6 studies related to trastuzumab-associated cardiotoxicity (n=642). The majority (35/40) of studies had a candidate gene approach, whereas 5 genome-wide association studies have been performed. We identified 25 genetic variants in 20 genes and 2 intergenic variants reported significant at least once. The overall validity of studies was limited, with small cohorts, failure to assess population ancestry and lack of replication. SNPs with the most robust evidence up to this point are rs1786814 (sarcomere structure and function), rs2229774 (topoisomerase-2β expression), rs7853758 (drug transport), rs17863783 (drug metabolism), and 1 intergenic variant (rs28714259). Existing evidence supports the hypothesis that genetic variation contributes to chemotherapy-related cardiac dysfunction. Although many variants identified by this systematic review show potential to improve risk stratification, future studies are necessary for validation and assessment of their value in a diagnostic and prognostic setting.

© 2018 American Heart Association, Inc.

Address: From the Department of Cardiology, Division of Heart & Lungs (M.L., A.J.T., M.J.C., F.W.A.) and Department of Medical Oncology (E.v.d.W.), University Medical Center Utrecht, University of Utrecht, The Netherlands; Durrer Center for Cardiovascular Research, Netherlands Heart Institute, Utrecht (F.W.A.); and Institute of Cardiovascular Science, Faculty of Population Health Sciences (F.W.A.) and Farr Institute of Health Informatics Research and Institute of Health Informatics (F.W.A.), University College London, United Kingdom.; From the Department of Cardiology, Division of Heart & Lungs (M.L., A.J.T., M.J.C., F.W.A.) and Department of Medical Oncology (E.v.d.W.), University Medical Center Utrecht, University of Utrecht, The Netherlands; Durrer Center for Cardiovascular Research, Netherlands Heart Institute, Utrecht (F.W.A.); and Institute of Cardiovascular Science, Faculty of Population Health Sciences (F.W.A.) and Farr Institute of Health Informatics Research and Institute of Health Informatics (F.W.A.), University College London, United Kingdom. [email protected].
Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.