Impact of Experimentally Induced Cognitive Dietary Restraint on Eating Behavior Traits, Appetite Sensations, and Markers of Stress during Energy Restriction in Overweight/Obese Women.

Isabelle Morin, Catherine Bégin, Julie Maltais-Giguère, Alexandra Bédard, André Tchernof, Simone Lemieux

Journal: Journal of obesity 2019;2018():4259389

PMID: 30123582

Plain Language Summary

plain language summary logo

The treatment of obesity has become a public health priority given the negative impact of this condition on physical and mental health. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of energy restriction alone or in combination with induced cognitive dietary restraint (CDR) on eating behaviour traits, appetite sensations, and markers of stress in overweight and obese premenopausal women. The study is a single-blinded randomised clinical study which recruited premenopausal women aged between 26 and 50 years. The participants were randomised to either an energy-restriction-plus-induced CDR condition (CDR+group) or an energy-restriction-without induced CDR condition (CDR−group). Results indicate that inducing CDR in a context of energy restriction had no further effects on eating behaviour traits, appetite sensations, and markers of stress in the short term as well as in the longer term than energy restriction alone. Authors conclude that increasing CDR has no negative impact on factors regulating energy balance in the context of energy restriction.

Abstract

Weight loss has been associated with changes in eating behaviors and appetite sensations that favor a regain in body weight. Since traditional weight loss approaches emphasize the importance of increasing cognitive dietary restraint (CDR) to achieve negative energy imbalance, it is difficult to untangle the respective contributions of energy restriction and increases in CDR on factors that can eventually lead to body weight regain. The present study aimed at comparing the effects of energy restriction alone or in combination with experimentally induced CDR on eating behavior traits, appetite sensations, and markers of stress in overweight and obese women. We hypothesized that the combination of energy restriction and induced CDR would lead to more prevalent food cravings, increased appetite sensations, and higher cortisol concentrations than when energy restriction is not coupled with induced CDR. A total of 60 premenopausal women (mean BMI: 32.0 kg/m; mean age: 39.4 y) were provided with a low energy density diet corresponding to 85% of their energy needs during a 4-week fully controlled period. At the same time, women were randomized to either a condition inducing an increase in CDR (CDR+ group) or a condition in which CDR was not induced (CRD- group). Eating behavior traits (Three-Factor Eating Questionnaire and Food Craving Questionnaire), appetite sensations (after standardized breakfast), and markers of stress (Perceived Stress Scale; postawakening salivary cortisol) were measured before ( = 0 week) and after ( = 4 weeks) the 4-week energy restriction, as well as 3 months later. There was an increase in CDR in the CDR+ group while no such change was observed in the CDR- group (=0.0037). No between-group differences were observed for disinhibition, hunger, cravings, appetite sensations, perceived stress, and cortisol concentrations. These results suggest that a slight increase in CDR has no negative impact on factors regulating energy balance in the context of energy restriction.

Address: Institute of Nutrition and Functional Foods (INAF), Pavillon des Services, Laval University, 2440 Boulevard Hochelaga, Québec, QC, Canada G1V 0A6.; School of Nutrition, Pavillon Paul-Comtois, Laval University, 2425 Rue de l'Agriculture, Québec, QC, Canada G1V 0A6.; School of Psychology, Pavillon Félix-Antoine-Savard, Laval University, 2325 Rue des Bibliothèques, Québec, QC, Canada G1V 0A6.; Endocrinology and Nephrology, CHU de Québec, Laval University Medical Center, 2705 Boulevard Laurier, Québec, QC, Canada G1V 4G2.; Quebec Heart and Lung Institute, Laval University, 2725 Chemin Ste-Foy, Québec, QC, Canada G1V 4G5.

Physical Environment

Laboratory Testing

Modifiable Lifestyle Factors

Jadad Score

Allocation Concealment

Bioactive Substances

Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.