Prospective Evaluation of Pasireotide in Patients Undergoing Pancreaticoduodenectomy: The Washington University Experience.

Ismael Dominguez-Rosado, Ryan C Fields, Cheryl A Woolsey, Gregory Williams, Timothy A Horwedel, J Bart Rose, Chet W Hammill, Maria B Doyle, William C Chapman, Steven M Strasberg, William G Hawkins, Dominic E Sanford

Journal: Journal of the American College of Surgeons 2019;226(2):147-154.e1

PMID: 29133263

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Pasireotide is a newer generation somatostatin analogue that led to a significant reduction in pancreatic fistula after pancreatectomy in a single-center randomized controlled trial. We sought to determine if pasireotide reduces the incidence of pancreatic fistula and other complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy at our high volume center.

STUDY DESIGN

All patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy between April 2011 and January 2017 were prospectively followed, and their complications were graded using the Modified Accordion Grading System (MAGS) in our institutional complications database. For 18 months, 5 pancreatic surgeons used pasireotide routinely in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy. Patients receiving pasireotide were then propensity score-matched to patients who did not receive pasireotide, and their outcomes were compared.

RESULTS

There were 459 patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy, and 127 patients (28%) received pasireotide. Patients who received pasireotide were significantly more likely to have dilated pancreatic ducts and have a drain left at the time of surgery. Patients who received pasireotide had no difference in pancreatic fistula, overall complications, 90-day readmission, or 90-day mortality. However, patients who received pasireotide had a significantly reduced rate of postoperative bleeding/anemia (8.7% vs 16.9%, p = 0.03). Among 112 propensity score-matched pairs, patients who received pasireotide did not have significantly different rates of pancreatic fistula, and the rates of severe (MAGS grades 3 to 6) pancreatic fistula were identical between the 2 groups (7.1% vs 7.1%, p = 1.00). Matched patients who received pasireotide had significantly decreased postoperative bleeding/anemia (9.8% vs 19.6%, p = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Pasireotide did not reduce the incidence or severity of pancreatic fistulas after pancreaticoduodenectomy, but was associated with a decrease in postoperative bleeding/anemia. A multicenter randomized trial is needed to accurately define the role of pasireotide in the postoperative management of pancreaticoduodenectomy patients.

Copyright © 2017. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Address: Department of Surgery, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Medicas y Nutricion Salvador Zubiran, Mexico City, Mexico.; Department of Surgery, Barnes-Jewish Hospital and Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO; Alvin J Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO.; Department of Surgery, Barnes-Jewish Hospital and Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO.; Department of Pharmacy, Barnes-Jewish Hospital, Saint Louis, MO.; Department of Surgery, Barnes-Jewish Hospital and Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO. Electronic address: [email protected].
Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.