A Review of Techniques to Measure Protein Sorption to Soft Contact Lenses.

Brad Hall, James A Forrest, Lyndon Jones

Journal: Eye & contact lens 2018;43(5):276-286

PMID: 28198731

Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare and critically evaluate a variety of techniques to measure the quantity and biological activity of protein sorption to contact lenses over short time periods.

METHODS

A literature review was undertaken investigating the major techniques to measure protein sorption to soft contact lens materials, with specific reference to measuring protein directly on lenses using in situ, ex situ, protein structural, and biological activity techniques.

RESULTS

The use of in situ techniques to measure protein quantity provides excellent sensitivity, but many are not directly applicable to contact lenses. Many ex situ techniques struggle to measure all sorbed proteins, and these measurements can have significant signal interference from the lens materials themselves. Techniques measuring the secondary and tertiary structures of sorbed proteins have exhibited only limited success.

CONCLUSIONS

There are a wide variety of techniques to measure both the amount of protein and the biological activity of protein sorbed to soft contact lens materials. To measure the mass of protein sorbed to soft contact lenses (not just thin films) over short time periods, the method of choice should be I radiolabeling. This technique is sensitive enough to measure small amounts of deposited protein, provided steps are taken to limit and measure any interaction of the iodine tracer with the materials. To measure the protein activity over short time periods, the method of choice should be to measure the biological function of sorbed proteins. This may require new methods or adaptations of existing ones.

Address: Centre for Contact Lens Research (B.H., J.A.F., L.J.), School of Optometry and Vision Science University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada; Department of Physics and Astronomy (J.A.F.), University of Waterloo, ON, Canada; Sengi Data (B.H.), Cambridge, ON, Canada; and Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics (J.A.F.), Waterloo, ON, Canada.

Link outs

Free resources

Other Literature Sources:

Subscription / membership required

Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.