Impact of switching to polypill based therapy by baseline potency of medication: Post-hoc analysis of the SPACE Collaboration dataset.

Anthony Rodgers, Sandrine Stepien, Anushka Patel, Chris Bullen, Ruth Webster, Vanessa Selak, Simon Thom

Journal: International journal of cardiology 2018;249():443-447

PMID: 28986058

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Fixed dose combinations of cardiovascular therapy ('polypills') have now been launched in several dozen countries. There is considerable clinical interest in the effects of switching to polypill-based care from typical current treatment regimens, especially if polypills contain components at sub-maximal dosage.

METHODS

The SPACE Collaboration includes three trials of polypill based care vs usual care in patients with established CVD or at high calculated risk. Individual patient data for 3140 trial participants were combined. Patients were categorized according to the potency of the statin and the number of BP lowering medications they were taking at baseline. Effects on adherence to anti-platelet medication, systolic blood pressure (SBP) and LDL cholesterol stratified by baseline potency of medication were determined using fixed effects models.

RESULTS

Randomisation to the polypill group was associated with improved SBP at 12months, but this improvement varied according to baseline BP regimen: -3.3, -5.9, -2.5 and +1mmHg for patients taking 0, 1, 2 and 3+ BP lowering medications at baseline. For changes in LDL cholesterol at 12months, significant improvements in LDL cholesterol were seen for those taking no statin (-0.21mmol/L; 95% CI: -0.34 to -0.07), less potent statin (-0.16mmol/L; 95% CI: -0.29 to -0.04) and equipotent statins (-0.14mmol/L; 95% CI -0.26 to -0.02) at baseline.

CONCLUSION

The adherence benefits of polypills tend to offset the loss of potency from use of individual components with lower dose potency, and to facilitate improvements in multiple risk factors.

Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Address: The George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia. Electronic address: [email protected].; National Institute for Health Innovation, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.; The George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.; Imperial College, London, United Kingdom.
Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.