Site of Tagging Influences the Ochratoxin Recognition by Peptide NFO4: A Molecular Dynamics Study.

Aby A Thyparambil, Tigran M Abramyan, Ingrid Bazin, Anthony Guiseppi-Elie

Journal: Journal of chemical information and modeling 2017;57(8):2035-2044

PMID: 28753003

Abstract

Molecular recognition by synthetic peptides is growing in importance in the design of biosensing elements used in the detection and monitoring of a wide variety of hapten bioanlaytes. Conferring specificity via bioimmobilization and subsequent recovery and purification of such sensing elements are aided by the use of affinity tags. However, the tag and its site of placement can potentially compromise the hapten recognition capabilities of the peptide, necessitating a detailed experimental characterization and optimization of the tagged molecular recognition entity. The objective of this study was to assess the impact of site-specific tags on a native peptide's fold and hapten recognition capabilities using an advanced molecular dynamics (MD) simulation approach involving bias-exchange metadynamics and Markov State Models. The in-solution binding preferences of affinity tagged NFO4 (VYMNRKYYKCCK) to chlorinated (OTA) and non-chlorinated (OTB) analogues of ochratoxin were evaluated by appending hexa-histidine tags (6× His-tag) to the peptide's N-terminus (NterNFO4) or C-terminus (CterNFO4), respectively. The untagged NFO4 (NFO4), previously shown to bind with high affinity and selectivity to OTA, served as the control. Results indicate that the addition of site-specific 6× His-tags altered the peptide's native fold and the ochratoxin binding mechanism, with the influence of site-specific affinity tags being most evident on the peptide's interaction with OTA. The tags at the N-terminus of NFO4 preserved the native fold and actively contributed to the nonbonded interactions with OTA. In contrast, the tags at the C-terminus of NFO4 altered the native fold and were agnostic in its nonbonded interactions with OTA. The tags also increased the penalty associated with solvating the peptide-OTA complex. Interestingly, the tags did not significantly influence the nonbonded interactions or the penalty associated with solvating the peptide-OTB complex. Overall, the combined contributions of nonbonded interaction and solvation penalty were responsible for the retention of the native hapten recognition capabilities in NterNFO4 and compromised native recognition capabilities in CterNFO4. Advanced MD approaches can thus provide structural and energetic insights critical to evaluate the impact of site-specific tags and may aid in the selection and optimization of the binding preferences of a specific biosensing element.

Address: Center for Bioelectronics, Biosensors and Biochips (C3B), Texas A&M University , College Station, Texas 77843, United States.; Department of Biomedical Engineering, College of Engineering, Texas A&M University , College Station, Texas 77843, United States.; Computational Biophysics & Molecular Design, Center for Integrative Chemical Biology and Drug Discovery, Eshelman School of Pharmacy, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill , Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599-7363, United States.; LGEI, L'Ecole des Mines d'Ales, Institut Mines Telecom, University of Montpellier , 6 Avenue de Clavieres, 30319 Ales cedex, France.; ABTECH Scientific, Inc. , Biotechnology Research Park, 800 East Leigh Street, Richmond, Virginia 23219, United States.

Link outs

Free resources

Other Literature Sources:

Subscription / membership required

Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.